Search for: "Jacobs v. Major"
Results 61 - 80
of 635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2014, 5:17 am
Last week the Court issued its decision in Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:05 am
The more controversial majority decision in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
An appeal to the Court of Appeal was allowed by a majority (Jacob LJ dissenting). [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 7:55 pm
This post was authored by Hillel Weiss, Jacob D. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:57 am
In this case, the Court says that unpaid volunteers who worked at Major League Baseball's Fan Fest in 2013 were not entitled to any compensation.The case is Chen v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 3:56 pm
He will discuss major disputes on which the Tribunal has adjudicated, including BPI v MCPS [Blogger's note - a superb judgement from Robin Jacob QC, as he then was] and Meltwater v NLA. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:47 pm
Under the law, a disability is an ailment that creates a substantial limitation on a major life activity, such as eating, seeing, mobility, etc. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:28 pm
Ocean Bay Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 6:41 am
The case was dismissed, but the Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Chin and Droney) brings it back in an unpublished decision that could easily have been a precedential ruling. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm
In L’Oréal v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:28 am
Jacobs does the same for Greenwire. [read post]
23 May 2020, 1:59 pm
In Gasparino v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:22 am
" Or, as Lord Justice Jacob wrote in Nokia v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 1:31 pm
This post was authored by Joseph DeMarzio, Touro College Jacob D. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:44 am
The majority objects to Judge Jacobs' dissent in a couple of ways. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:57 pm
Complete with both a majority opinion as well as a dissent. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Finally, the dissent disagreed with the majority’s application of King v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:30 am
Court of Appeal Overturning the High Court’s decision by a 2-1 majority, the Court of Appeal (per Longmore LJ and Sir Robin Jacob) held that the restrictions issued by JKX were valid and had not been imposed for an ‘improper purpose’. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:19 am
In DeWeerth v. [read post]
