Search for: "Jacobs v. Major"
Results 81 - 100
of 635
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2018, 6:04 am
Consortium v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:01 am
Judge Newman agrees with Judge Pooler's analysis.In dissent, Judge Jacobs, a longtime proponent of qualified immunity, objects that the majority is asking too much of police officers to keep track of both federal and state court rulings to avoid liability in federal court. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:43 am
Jacobs, which held that the discovery rule did not apply to professional negligence claims.) [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 5:57 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Cabranes and Menashi) vacates summary judgment in favor of the MTA and remands the case to see if the MTA was providing the disabled plaintiffs a reasonable accommodation.The case is Brooklyn Center for Independence of the Disabled v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
In Hutterville Hutterian Brethren v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:54 am
Congress, in passing the Major Crimes Act, “intended full implementation offederal criminal jurisdiction in those situations to which the Major Crimes Act extended” United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 8:49 am
Jacobs, C.A. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
In Costello v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 10:30 am
In Globis Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
” The opinion was joined by Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:27 pm
Nemec v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:13 pm
The case is New York Legal Assistance Group v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:55 am
Yesterday, the UCLA Environmental Law Clinic filed a brief in the California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:35 am
Even greater concerns have been generated by the Supreme Court of Canada's 2007 decision in Union des Consommateurs v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
See 681 F. 3d, at 147 (Jacobs, C. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 6:46 am
But there are some major exceptions to this rule, as shown by a recent Second Circuit case against the County of Rensselaer.The case is Gorman v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 7:53 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
As Darren explains, the Supreme Court of the USA has just weighed in on the same matter in the case of Teva v Sandoz.* Exodus 2.0: pirate sites and the seven seasJeremy gives the floor to Míchel Olmedo Cuevas, who seizes the moment when a brand-new Hollywood colossal is being launched to explain the brand-new enforcement measures that the recent Spanish reform provides to battle online copyright infringement.* Softly, softly: General Court no-hopes Pianissimo… [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 8:52 am
Anderson shared an episode of Rational Security 2.0 which covers the legacy of Sept. 11, the future of the U.S. drone program and more: Kurup explained the background and procedural history of Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
