Search for: "Jacobs v. Marks"
Results 41 - 60
of 562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2020, 5:27 am
It found the involved goods and services to be related, concluding that the "something more" test of Jacobs v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
He can do no better than to bring to the attention of his readers the words delivered by Lord Justice Jacob this morning: "3. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 12:58 am
And here it is ...Following yesterday's Rapid Response Seminar on the European Court of Justice ruling on last week's trade mark dilution in Case C-252/07 Intel Corp v CPM (UK) Ltd, jointly run by Class 46 and Hardwicke Building, the PowerPoint presentations of three of the four speakers (covering dilution in France, Germany and the Netherlands), together with a bonus in the form of an additional comment on the impact of Intel v CPM in Poland by Tomasz Rychlicki,… [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:19 am
” Jacobs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:49 pm
Co-authored by Jacob Oslick and Noah Finkel Mark Twain famously said that “there are lies, damn lies, and statistics. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 6:00 pm
Jacob S. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
” See Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 3:10 am
It appears from the Court of Appeal cases of Lord Browne V Associated and the Prince of Wales v Associated that such speculations are either private since they derived from an intimate relationship and/or confidential insofar as they derive from confidential FA business information. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:06 pm
This morning the Court issued its opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
Colour marks per se.9. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 2:01 am
It may not be Marbury v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
., women’s clothing, costumes, and accessories,” filed suit in a California federal court against Fendi (an Italian fashion brand) and Marc Jacobs (an American fashion designer) alleging that the latter are selling goods which feature a logo that is “confusingly similar” to Roma’s registered mark. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 8:58 am
PatentsHenry Yang reported about the Interdigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539. [read post]
6 May 2021, 2:00 am
And is this decision really the Oversight Board’s Marbury v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Upholding the factual findings below as well as the interpretation of the law followed, Lord Justice Kitchin, who gave the leading judgment, clearly had in mind the power of a shape trade mark, and its ability to remove rival products from the market (see the citation at paragraph 79 of Jacob J (as he then was) in the 2002 case of Nestlé v Unilever). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:03 am
Read the case here: THI of Texas v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 2:44 am
Aachi Spices & Foods v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
Rather belatedly passing on an interesting case I picked up on my Lawtel update a few days ago about getting an injunction in comparative advertising cases (Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 584 CA (Civ Div) (Pill LJ, Longmore LJ, Jacob LJ) 20/6/2007). [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:36 am
Alliance for Good Government v. [read post]
