Search for: "Jacobs v. Marks"
Results 61 - 80
of 562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
This Kat, however, thinks that AG Wathelet is right and that, when he says"[The applicant] must prove that only the trade mark in respect of which registration is sought, as opposed to any other trade marks which may also be present, indicates, without any possibility of confusion, the exclusive origin of the goods or services at issue",he is vindicating the point made by Sir Robin Jacob about "limping marks" back in the 1990s in Philips… [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
Cir. 2003) (quoting Jacobs v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:20 pm
In re Wente Bros. dba Tamas Estates, Serial No. 77314718 (August 6, 2009) [not precedential].The CCPA's decision in Jacobs v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:49 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 5:47 am
Chatam International Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:45 am
Cadbury UK Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents Designs And Trade Marks [2018] EWCA Civ 2715 (05 December 2018) is an unedifying case. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:06 am
See Jacobs v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
As Darren explains, the Supreme Court of the USA has just weighed in on the same matter in the case of Teva v Sandoz.* Exodus 2.0: pirate sites and the seven seasJeremy gives the floor to Míchel Olmedo Cuevas, who seizes the moment when a brand-new Hollywood colossal is being launched to explain the brand-new enforcement measures that the recent Spanish reform provides to battle online copyright infringement.* Softly, softly: General Court no-hopes Pianissimo… [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 2:55 am
" In sum, the marks are similar in sight, sound, connotation and commercial impression.The Goods and Services: "[T]he mere fact that a restaurant may offer certain food items or beverages does not by itself mean that the food or drink is related to the restaurant services; rather, in order '[t]o establish likelihood of confusion a party must show something more than that similar or even identical marks are used for food products and for restaurant… [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:40 pm
The application of this standard can be traced back to In re Coors Brewing Co. 343 F.3d 1340 (Fed. cir. 2003) and Jacobs v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 4:26 am
The controversial Leeds United Chairman, Ken Bates, was the defendant in a remarkable harassment claim heard last week in the Leeds County Court by Judge Mark Gosnell. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* Hospira v Genentech Mark 1, the AppealThe dispute between Hospira and Genentech in the UK courts is getting a little confusing. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:32 am
| Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation | Lord Neuberger's most difficult case | US Senate passes Trade Secrets Act Never too late 90 [week ending on Sunday 3 April] – Book review: "IP and Other Things" by Sir Robin Jacob| Book review: "Trade Marks Law" by Glen Gibbons| IPKat Post #10,00 | Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others |Two Book Reviews: European Law Design… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:13 am
He referred in particular to comments by Laddie J in Mercury Communications Ltd v Mercury Interactive (UK) Ltd [1995] FSR 850, at 863-865; by Jacob J in Laboratoire De La Mer Trade Marks [2002] FSR 51, at [19]; and by Aldous LJ in Thomson Holidays v Norwegian Cruise Line [2002] EWCA Civ 1828; [2003] RPC 32, at [29]. [read post]
