Search for: "Jake Linford"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm
Introduction: Robert Burrell IP Australia exerts extraordinary control over legislative agenda; if you can persuade IP Au. that something needs to change, then it can change quite quickly. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Jake Linford: Perhaps the consequences for the defendant are different, so we expect different behavior from consumers before applying those consequences. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Jake Linford: What is the payoff? [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
” As noted by Professor Jake Linford, the examples used by the Court when it discusses application of the Rogers test focus on uses in the title or content of artistic works (not on T-shirts). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:04 am
In his fascinating 2020 article in Cardozo Law Review, entitled Copyright and Attention Scarcity, Jake Linford provided a new justification for copyright law's barriers against derivative content—saving the overtaxed attention spans of copyrights' beleaguered audience. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Changes in Trademark Law and Evidentiary Rules Introduction: Jake Linford Before courts admitted surveys routinely, they were concerned about hearsay. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Jake Linford: First Amendment Lochnerism—used as a deregulatory move can happen on a number of different fronts. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
Jake Linford, Justin Sevier & Allyson Willis, Trademark Tarnishmyths (Aug. 6, 2022), available at SSRN. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Mark Movsesian, The New Thoreaus, (Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Forthcoming).Jake Linford, Justin Sevier & Allyson Willis, Trademark Tarnishmyths (August 6, 2022).Dov Fox, Medical Disobedience, (Harvard Law Review, Vol. 136, Forthcoming).Daniel O. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:49 pm
Jake Linford: how different is the concept “use” from the concept “speech” in your conception? [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 12:53 pm
Measuring the Harms of Unauthorized Campaign Music Jake Linford and Aaron Perzanowski Licensing entities’ constituencies believe there’s a problem, leading the licensors to create opt out for political uses. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Jake Linford Prefers forfeiture, b/c it’s not just nonuse but naked licensing and alteration. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Intro, Graeme Dinwoodie Ornamentality is undertheorized. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Aaron Perzanowski & Jake Linford, Politics, Copyright, and Tarnishment Foo Fighters objected to McCain campaign’s use of music and complained it had potential to tarnish; Sam Moore objected to Obama’s use and said we’re worried people will think we endorsed you. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:49 am
Jake Linford: YT is providing the service to noncommercial users for free, in exchange for data mining. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Panel 18 – Trademark Liability: Jake Linford, Justin Sevier, Allyson Willis, Sex, Drugs, and Trademark Tarnishmyths Sex/drugs inherently tarnishing? [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:37 pm
Jake Linford: are there overlaps with patents and boat hulls suggesting two bites at apple. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 12:54 am
Chapter 9, by Jake Linford, makes suggestions to "democratize" access to survey evidence, which is often unavailable to litigants with limited budgets. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
The following short statement was written by Prof. [read post]
