Search for: "Jamal Greene" Results 141 - 160 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On 29 January 2019 Arcadia and Sir Philip Green discontinued their action against the Daily Telegraph. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” But it has seldom been used to describe instances of law’s own failings.To offer but one example of this reticence, take Jamal Greene’s justifiably renowned article on the Supreme Court’s “anticanon. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:11 am by J. Dana Stuster
A spokesman for one Shia militia left Al-Monitor with the impression that Tehran has “given the unit the green light to attack Kirkuk if it decides to secede from Iraq. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” became a term of denunciation, Jamal Greene shows, as both liberals and conservatives united in their repudiation of the case. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am by JB
Recently Jamal Greene has argued that judges often use originalist arguments whenever they are construing a piece of constitutional text that looks to them like a rule but is ambiguous. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:14 am by David Pozen
And that is precisely what the Knight Institute’s next visiting scholar, Jamal Greene, will be asking academics and advocates to do in a forthcoming paper series. [*] Klonick’s essay is being published, along with three response pieces, as the seventh and final installment in a series I have been editing for the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
More recently, he minimized the significance of the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi Arabian consulate in Turkey by repeatedly stating that Khashoggi was “not a citizen. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 12:24 pm by Nora Ellingsen
His new “green bird” Twitter account indicated his support for violent jihad and put his online collaborators at ease. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:28 am by Guest Blogger
The burden of Jamal Greene’s book on judicial review is to urge greater accommodation of American judicial doctrine to strongly held political determinations. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Commentators Faiza Patel (Director, Liberty & National Security, Brennan Center for Justice) and Henry Olsen (Senior Fellow, Ethics & Public Policy Center; Columnist, The Washington Post) spoke with OSB members Jamal Greene (Professor, Columbia Law School), Ronaldo Lemos (Professor, Rio de Janeiro State University’s Law School), Julie Owono (Executive Director, Internet Sans Frontières), and John Samples (Vice President, CATO Institute). ● Katy Glenn… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:20 am by James Fox
”  Originalism is generally seen as incompatible with, and even hostile to, the interests and concerns of African Americans, as Jamal Greene as so nicely shown. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am by Joshua Matz
”  And at Just Enrichment, Adam Chandler considers whether the “long arc of history” may “bend toward health care reform,” while in the New York Daily News Jamal Greene contends that “[i]f Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts rules against Obamacare, he will prove himself a political partisan. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Jay Willis
”  Among other articles, Linda Greenhouse traces Justice Stevens’s role as a supporter of abortion rights; Jamal Greene documents the Court’s gradual move from “privacy to liberty as a constitutional basis for the freedom to make fundamental life decisions,” a shift that Justice Stevens ardently supported; and Diane Marie Amann documents the Justice’s evolving views on diversity and affirmative action. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
On broader issues, Jamal Greene, guest-posting at Balkinization, discusses the success of originalism as a conservative intellectual movement and argues that progressive intellectuals cannot expect to effect similar doctrinal changes. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
Law professor at Columbia Law School, Jamal Greene, wrote that the legal question the Court presented—whether the Colorado anti-discrimination law impermissibly forces the web designer “to speak or stay silent”—is “too broad. [read post]