Search for: "James Eckert" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
During the lead-up to the ballot initiative, 109’s chief petitioners (psychotherapists Tom and Sheri Eckert) repeatedly sold the measure as a needed solution for the mental healthcare crisis. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 10:47 am by Stephen Bilkis
Matter of Eckert, 2022 NY Slip Op 50095(U) revolves around the intestate estate of James Eckert, who passed away in 2018, sparking a legal dispute between his surviving child, Michelle Eckert, and his spouse, Tara Connelly. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by Joel R. Brandes
 August 2, 2023Appellate Division, First DepartmentAge 29 Law allows unmarried children through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, to be covered under a parent’s group health insurance policy  In B.D. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
James Little became the first defendant to receive a combination of a 60-day jail term and 36 months of probation. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Kelly Loeffler, James Inhofe, and Dianne Feinstein it will not pursue insider trading charges against them after an investigation into stock transactions from the early days of the coronavirus pandemic did not find sufficient evidence that they had broken the law. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Alicia Cherem and Carly Taylor with sidebar by Kaitlyn Hopkins and James Crabtree-Hannigan] I reported on the same trend in 2017 and again last year. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Juvan Bonni
Klarquist Sparkman, LLP Stoel Rives LLP Dority & Manning Steptoe–Life Sciences Patent Litigation Associate Steptoe–Patent Litigation Associate Middleton Reutlinger Eckert Seamans Steptoe–Patent Agent/Technical Specialist Blackbird Technologies [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm by Francis Pileggi
This post was prepared by Justin Forcier, an associate in the Wilmington office of Eckert Seamans. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm by Brian Shiffrin
by James Eckert, Monroe County Assistant Public DefenderThe Court of Appeals, Fahey, J. writing for the court, held: "as a matter of state evidentiary law, that evidence of a defendant's selective silence generally may not be used by the People as part of their case-in-chief, either to allow the jury to infer the defendant's admission of guilt or to impeach the credibility of the defendant's version of events when the defendant has not testified. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by admin
Ashmore – @kcashmore1 Jason Augustine – @augustinelaw Brandy Harman Austin @thebrandyaustin, @brandyaustinlaw Steve Autry – @autry13 Kencade Babb – @kencadeb Ann Massey Badmus – @annbadmus Bill Bailey – @bbaileylaw David Bailey – @dabjd Leigh Bailey – @leigh_bailey Trina McReynolds Bailey – @trinamcrey Lindley Bain – @lindleybain Lee Baldwin – @leebaldwin55 Marissa Balius – @marissabalius Katie Bandy – @bandykatherine,… [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by admin
Ashmore – @kcashmore1 Jason Augustine – @augustinelaw Brandy Harman Austin @thebrandyaustin, @brandyaustinlaw Steve Autry – @autry13 Kencade Babb – @kencadeb Ann Massey Badmus – @annbadmus Bill Bailey – @bbaileylaw David Bailey – @dabjd Leigh Bailey – @leigh_bailey Trina McReynolds Bailey – @trinamcrey Lindley Bain – @lindleybain Lee Baldwin – @leebaldwin55 Marissa Balius – @marissabalius Katie Bandy – @bandykatherine,… [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:20 am by Zoe Tillman
Lead counsel for the defendants – Dale Hershey of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott for CC Metals & Alloys, Inc., Arent Fox's James Hulme for Elkem Metals Inc., and Charles Claxton of Bethesda, Md.'s Garson Claxton for Applied Industrial Materials Corp. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:23 am
Mowell's motorycle received total damage and was towed from the scene of the crash by Eckert Tow. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:36 am
On April 19, 2012, the Honorable James M. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:00 pm by Brian Shiffrin
by James EckertIn People v Johnson (2011 NY Slip Op 04764 [6/9/11])the Court of Appeals ruled that a juror who said she could set aside her personal views on the insanity defense and could apply the law as set forth by the court should have been removed for cause based on subsequent statements by the juror on the same subject matter. [read post]