Search for: "James R. Copland"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2018, 6:12 am
Larcker (Stanford Graduate School of Business), Brian Tayan (Stanford Graduate School of Business), and James R. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
Larcker (Stanford Graduate School of Business), Brian Tayan (Stanford Graduate School of Business), and James R. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
James R. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:51 am
More: BNA, James Copland, WSJ: The industry reaction was swift, with Wall Street and its advocates warning of unintended consequences of the rule within hours of the CFPB proposing it on Thursday. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:36 pm
The Wall Street Journal recently ran an editorial titled, “Why the Trial Bar and Its Friends Detest Arbitration” by James R. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 5:44 am
A Report on Corporate Governance and Shareholder Activism by James R. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Editor's Note: James R. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:16 am
Editor's Note: James R. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 2:03 pm
James R. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
” James R. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
Editor's Note: James R. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:11 am
A third deficiency pointed out by James R. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 4:54 am
Editor’s Note: James R. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:58 pm
James R. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 12:52 pm
Editor’s Note: James R. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
Editor’s Note: James R. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:10 am
James R. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:35 am
Last November, I joined Professor Stephen Bainbridge (UCLA Law School) and James Copland (Director, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute) in submitting this comment letter opposing ISS’ proposal to change its case-by-case approach to stockholder proposals with respect to disclosure of corporate political spending. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:34 am
Editor’s Note: James R. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
I had joinedProfessor Stephen Bainbridge (UCLA Law School) and James Copland (Director, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute) in submitting this comment letter opposing the change. [read post]