Search for: "James v. Federal Insurance Co." Results 1 - 20 of 291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Custodia has a Special Purpose Depository Institution (SPDI) charter from the State of Wyoming that allows it to take deposits but does not require it to obtain insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). [read post]
Authors: Ray Giblett, James Morris, Rajaee Rouhani, Stephen Lee, Jeremy Moller, Charles Nugent-Young, Merren Taylor, Timothy Chan, Joshua Kan, Dylan Sault and Steven Li  Welcome to our first wrap up of the year! [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co (2002): How Can Something So Wrong Feel So Right? [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The article’s authors are Marisa DeMartini, Vice President, Management Claims Liability Manager, Ascot Insurance Company, James Talbert, Associate, Bailey Cavalieri LLC and Elan Kandel, Member, Bailey Cavalieri LLC. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
According to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), acts of violence is currently the third-leading cause of fatal occupational injuries in the U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary.… [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,[3] languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]