Search for: "James v. Federal Insurance Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary.… [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
James Island Charter Sch., 840 F. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,[3] languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
JAMES W. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Whitlock v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 8:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:21 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:38 am
By: James C. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
Home Assurance Co., 267 N.J. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 11:03 am
Co. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 12:33 pm
[v] See, e.g., Home Federal Savings & Loan Assoc of Niles v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 7:24 am
Will FTC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
; 7:21-cv-10179, Anderson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
; 7:21-cv-10179, Anderson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 12:26 pm
District Judge James V. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 1:10 pm
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 21-652Issue: Whether a person suffers Article III injury-in-fact when an insurer breaches its contractual obligation to pay for the person’s medical care. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am
The Federal Rules of Evidence, for instance, limits the rule against hearsay to “statements,” meaning written assertions or nonverbal conduct (such as nodding in agreement) that is intended as an assertion.[2] When persons in wedding ceremonies say “I do,” at the appropriate moments, they are married, by virtue of their speech acts. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am
Lacewell, 20-1501, involving the application to church health plans of New York’s regulation mandating that employer health insurance plans cover abortions, and remanded for further consideration in light of last term’s Fulton v. [read post]
