Search for: "Jane Chong, Benjamin Wittes"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2017, 7:22 am
And at the "Lawfare" blog, Benjamin Wittes and Jane Chong have a post titled "It's Time: Congress Needs to Open a Formal Impeachment Inquiry. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 11:04 am
, by Benjamin Wittes Donald Trump and a Tale of Two Washingtons, by Benjamin Wittes "The Loneliest Job": Donald Trump, Barack Obama, and the Moral Requirements of the Presidency, by Quinta Jurecic Statement by Fifty Former National Security Officials re Donald Trump, by John Bellinger The Trump National Security Paradox, by Benjamin Wittes The National Security Gap and the Myth of an ISIS-Busting Trump, by Jane Chong… [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 5:44 am
Jane Chong answered the question Benjamin Wittes posed last week: why do so many voters endorse Trump’s vision of national security that directly contravenes the bipartisan consensus of experts? [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 6:04 am
Jane Chong flagged an upcoming book on cyber policy, in which she has authored a chapter, Cyber Insecurity: Navigating the Perils of the Next Information Age. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 7:42 am
Jane Chong asked how the DOJ does and should handle pre-election disclosures about investigations. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 5:33 am
Jane Chong and Benjamin Wittes argued that the time has come for Congress to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Trump. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 3:48 am
Jane Chong posted key documents in a government effort to obtain information from a web hosting company on visitors to an anti-Trump organizing website. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
Jane Chong asked whether the acting attorney general can block White House requests to access national security information that might be part of an attempt to interfere politically with DoJ’s investigative power. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 6:15 am
Jane Chong argued that Congress may impeach a president for anticonstitutional abuses of power—even using powers that fall squarely within the executive's purview. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
The Fate of the Third-Party Doctrine by Michael Bahar, David Cook, Varun Shingari, Curtis Arnold In Defense of the Mosaic Theory by Paul Rosenzweig Phones Move--and So Should the Law by Susan Landau The Lawfare Podcast: Orin Kerr on Carpenter with Benjamin Wittes The Carpenter Argument: Quick Video Reactions on Twitter and Facebook Live by Orin Kerr And let’s not forget the DreamHost search warrant controversy: DreamHost Document Summaries Justice Department… [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am
Trump, Emma Kohse summarized it, and Benjamin Wittes reviewed the two big questions at issue in the Trump case, and how they were handled by the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
6 May 2017, 7:40 am
Jane Chong, Benjamin Wittes and I kicked off the week by proposing seven different theories that might explain what we know so far about L’Affaire Russe. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am
On Rational Security, the gang gave a pre-testimony roundup of the blizzard of new Comey news, including a dramatic reading of Comey’s written testimony by Shane Harris: Jane Chong, Wittes, and Jurecic liveblogged Comey’s testimony on Thursday. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 4:07 am
Jane Chong posted a statement from the Military Commissions Deputy Chief Prosecutor Robert C. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
Jane Chong highlighted some less-covered themes from Trump’s first press conference of his presidency. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 8:53 am
Russell Spivak summarized the order, and Jane Chong criticized press coverage of the issue. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
Jane Chong argued that the Trump administration presents important security risks—both because of the appointments of General Michael Flynn and Steve Bannon, and because of Trump’s many conflicts of interest. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 7:32 am
Jane Chong rounded up exit memos released by 27 Obama administration agency and department heads. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 6:08 am
Jane Chong and Alice C. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
Jane Chong provided a guide to understanding the Court’s ruling, and Josh Blackman provided his analysis, following up on his original predictions. [read post]