Search for: "Jane Chong" Results 61 - 80 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Alex Potcovaru
In other L’Affaire Russe news, on Tuesday morning Rosenstein testified before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee on the Justice Department’s proposed F2018 budget, which Jane Chong liveblogged; many of the questions ended up being about Russia and Mueller. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
Jane Chong analyzed whether § 1373 of the Immigration and Nationality Act unconstitutionally commandeers the states. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:36 am by Helen Klein Murillo
Jane Chong argued that inaccurate reporting on President Trump’s sanctuary cities executive order and policy compounds the misinformation problem. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 9:52 am by Jordan Brunner
  Jane Chong discussed whether Devin Nunes thinks he really “recused” himself from HPSCI’s Russian investigation. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am by Jordan Brunner
Jane Chong expressed alarm at systematic alt-right world-building by Steve Bannon and Michael Flynn as indicated by changes in the CVE program. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:24 pm by Alex Potcovaru
Jane Chong summarized her reply to a critique of her recent piece on the Office of Legal Counsel and Comptroller General opinions on the Emoluments Clause. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:45 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Jane Chong argued that Trump’s conflicts of interest present a serious national security problem. [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:51 am by Quinta Jurecic
Lawfare liveblogged both events, and Jane Chong summarized the oral argument. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:05 am by Jordan Brunner, Quinta Jurecic
Jane Chong flagged the new, unclassified CIA procedures for handling U.S. person information under E.O. 12333. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:30 am by Peter Margulies
Moreover, while the Destroyer Deal was a wise policy, I believe the revised EO’s effects will be counterproductive (for a valuable discussion of the threats not addressed by the EO, see Jane Chong’s analysis here). [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
  ICYMI: Yesterday, On Lawfare Jane Chong summarized Monday’s oral arguments in the Fourth Circuit revised travel ban case. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 10:00 am by Josh Blackman
This week, Benjamin Wittes and Jane Chong suggested that Congress should open an impeachment inquiry into President Trump's behavior. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:25 pm by Matthew Kahn
Jane Chong live-blogged the oral argument before the U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm by Garrett Hinck
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jane Chong and Benjamin Wittes argued that the time has come for Congress to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Matthew Kahn
Jane Chong and Quinta liveblogged the Senate Intelligence Committee’s hearing on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and Quinta compiled transcript highlights from key sections of the hearing that touched on the Russia investigation. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:46 am by Jordan Brunner, Quinta Jurecic
    ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jane Chong suggested that we are living in a world of informational asymmetry which favors President-elect Trump, and proposed how to handle it. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am by Zachary Burdette
Jane Chong asked how the DOJ does and should handle pre-election disclosures about investigations. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:19 am by Nora Ellingsen
Bobby initially wrote about the case when the criminal complaint was unsealed last October, and Jane Chong linked to the indictment here. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 10:54 am by Jordan Brunner
Susan, Jane Chong, and Chris Mirasola assured those concerned that based on their reading of the relevant statutes, Acting Attorney General Dana Boente can issue FISA applications. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 10:46 am by Quinta Jurecic
" Jane Chong wrote that the roles of Stephen Bannon and General Michael Flynn in the Trump administration present a national security threat. [read post]