Search for: "Jane Chong"
Results 61 - 80
of 143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2017, 11:00 am
Benjamin Wittes highlighted the importance of developing common vocabulary to describe them; Jane Chong stressed the consequences, including legal ones, of President Obama labeling the Boston Marathon bombings terrorism but not the Charleston shootings; and Susan Hennessey spoke particularly of the legal logic in categorizing terrorism. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 1:13 pm
ICYMI: This weekend, on Lawfare Jane Chong provided a deep analysis of the Foreign Emoluments Clause and how the Justice Department’s recent position contradicts the historical position of the Office of Legal Counsel. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm
Ben, Quinta Jurecic, and Jane Chong liveblogged Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 12:20 pm
Jane Chong liveblogged Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s testimony before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
In Lawfare last month, Alice Hill and Jane Chong referenced the National Intelligence Council’s examination of the threat of climate change that. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:29 am
Jane Chong announced the launch of a new Lawfare resource page collecting developments and news on what’s known about L’Affaire Russe. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:21 am
Apropos of Charleston, Jane Chong weighed in with a detailed study of both relevant statutes and official statements categorizing domestic terrorism as opposed to hate crimes. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am
Then there was Wednesday, when Jane Chong, Quinta, Susan, Matt, and Ben put forth initial reactions to the appointment of Bob Mueller as Special Counsel on the Russia Connection matter. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Jane Chong, a Ford Foundation fellow spending some time with Lawfare, wrote her inaugural post about a recent dismissal of a former GTMO detainee’s lawsuit against the DOD. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
In other L’Affaire Russe news, on Tuesday morning Rosenstein testified before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee on the Justice Department’s proposed F2018 budget, which Jane Chong liveblogged; many of the questions ended up being about Russia and Mueller. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
Jane Chong analyzed whether § 1373 of the Immigration and Nationality Act unconstitutionally commandeers the states. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:45 pm
Jane Chong argued that Trump’s conflicts of interest present a serious national security problem. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:30 am
Moreover, while the Destroyer Deal was a wise policy, I believe the revised EO’s effects will be counterproductive (for a valuable discussion of the threats not addressed by the EO, see Jane Chong’s analysis here). [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
Jane Chong posted key documents related to a Justice Department order to obtain information on visitors to an anti-Trump organizing website. [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:51 am
Lawfare liveblogged both events, and Jane Chong summarized the oral argument. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am
Jane Chong asked how the DOJ does and should handle pre-election disclosures about investigations. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
Jane Chong flagged yesterday’s Senate and House Intelligence Committee hearings on Russian meddling in the U.S. elections. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am
Jane Chong expressed alarm at systematic alt-right world-building by Steve Bannon and Michael Flynn as indicated by changes in the CVE program. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:25 pm
Jane Chong live-blogged the oral argument before the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
Jane Chong and Quinta liveblogged the Senate Intelligence Committee’s hearing on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and Quinta compiled transcript highlights from key sections of the hearing that touched on the Russia investigation. [read post]
