Search for: "Jane S. Schacter" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2022, 5:44 am by John Lande
From Stanford Professor Jane Schacter: I am chairing the search committee to replace the retiring Jan Martinez as Director of Stanford’s Gould Center Program on Negotiation and Mediation. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
EPA Decision on June 30, 2022 Stanford’s Deborah Sivas on Supreme Court’s Decision to Limit EPA’s Powers to Fight Climate Change by Professor  Deborah Sivas In a 6 to 3 vote, the U.S. [read post]
A Constitutional Earthquake: Stanford’s Jane Schacter on SCOTUS Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:47 am by John J. Donohue III, Jane S. Schacter
A Constitutional Earthquake: Stanford’s Jane Schacter on SCOTUS Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Today I'll take as my point of departure the amicus brief with which I'm most familiar--one filed on behalf of me and 12 other constitutional law scholars (Lee Bollinger, Erwin Chemerinsky, Sherry Colb, Dan Farber, Joanna Grossman, Leah Litman, Martha Minow, Jane Schacter, Suzanna Sherry, Geof Stone, David Strauss, and Larry Tribe).The core of our argument goes like this: Mississippi is plainly wrong in its contention that the abortion right has no connection to other… [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm by Jane S. Schacter
Jane Schacter is the William Nelson Cromwell professor of law at Stanford Law School. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional analysis and commentary comes from James Hohmann for The Washington Post; Jane Schacter and Pamela Karlan at Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, here and here; Deborah Pearlstein at TPM Café; and Richard Hasen at Slate, who maintains that Stevens’ controlling opinion for the court in Crawford v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate Blog offers a Q&A about the cases with law professor Jane Schacter. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Lyle Denniston at Constitution Daily and Tony Mauro at The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required) At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Jane Schacter writes that “what signals there are in the majority opinion about the larger conflict suggests that issue may well be resolved against the broadest claims made by merchants seeking religiously-based exemptions from the command of… [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:17 pm
Lawrence Friedman and Jane Schacter; and moderator, Hon. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Amy Howe
Commentary comes from Linda Greenhouse for The New York Times, Jane Schacter, Hank Greely, and Michelle Mello at Legal Aggregate, Cecelia Boone in The Dallas Morning News, Scott Lemieux at Democracy, and Garrett Epps of The Atlantic. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
E.L., in which the Justices ruled that states must recognize an adoption by a same-sex parent that occurred in another state, comes from Jane Schacter, who at Stanford’s Legal Aggregate argues that the decision “creates important protection for families with LGBT parents”; and from Gregory Lipper, who at Protect Thy Neighbor contends that, although “the Alabama Supreme Court got its comeuppance, it’s easy to overlook the human costs… [read post]