Search for: "Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees" Results 21 - 40 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2018, 5:25 am by Public Employment Law Press
Source: Albany Time UnionIn its decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 85 U. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 7:20 am by Thomas J. Crane
American Federation of State and County Municipal Employees, No. 16-1466 (6/27/2018), the court ruled that employees who are not members of a union cannot be compelled to pay reduced dues, even though they accept the benefits of the union bargaining. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am by Andree Blumstein
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 may prove to be telling. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:46 pm by Lindsay Colvin Stone
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31, No. 16-1466, 2018 WL 3129785 (June 27, 2018) a 5-4 majority of the Court rejected the holding of the 1977 case Abood v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 7:44 am by First Mondays
 American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31; Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:33 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, has broad implications for 23 states, including California, that have fair-share laws. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:06 am by Patrick Wright
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 is the fourth case since 2012 in which Abood v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:34 am
The American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (“AFSCME”) argues that imposing agency fees on all workers allows unions to appropriately and fairly represent all workers’ interests, which unions are legally required to do. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm by Mark Walsh
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 31. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:34 am by Amy Howe
Like many employees, Mark Janus was upset about deductions from his paycheck – specifically, the roughly $45 per month that goes to the local branch of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, the union that represents him. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, as well as at Howe on the Court, where it was originally published.] [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 7:47 am by Tammy Binford
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Counsel 31. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (16-1466), the plaintiffs are hoping the fully constituted Court will overrule Abood v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the justices have once again been asked to consider whether public-sector unions may require non-members to pay fees to cover certain union costs. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am by Xavier Becerra and Aimee Feinberg
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31: Unions that give voice to public employees may no longer be able to effectively do their job, depending on how the Supreme Court rules. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, a case pitting the First Amendment claims of dissenting employees against the interests of public-sector unions. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, earlier here, here, and here] Ray of hope on Golden State finances: Gov. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:15 am by First Mondays
American Federation of State, Municipal and County Employees, which concerns the constitutionality of public-sector union agency fees. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (16-1466), argued before the Justices on February 26, holds many implications, most directly for public-sector unions, but also for private-sector unions. [read post]