Search for: "Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees" Results 141 - 160 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am by Catherine Fisk
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 presents a First Amendment challenge to all Illinois public-sector labor-relations statutes and all Illinois government labor contracts that require union-represented employees to pay a fee to the union for services that the union is required by law to provide. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 7:20 am by Deborah La Fetra
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:34 am by Amy Howe
Like many employees, Mark Janus was upset about deductions from his paycheck – specifically, the roughly $45 per month that goes to the local branch of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, the union that represents him. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (16-1466), takes the opposite position from DOJ’s amicus brief filed two years earlier, in Friedrichs v California Teachers Association (14-915), to argue that it is time to overturn Abood v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 comes from Lyle Denniston at his eponymous blog, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Marcia Coyle at Law.com, and Mark Walsh at Education Week’s School Law Blog. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:28 am by Lyle Denniston
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 31. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, noting that “even if Mr. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whetheran Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, arguing that “everything public employee unions do is inherently political—which is all the more reason to allow non-consenting employees to opt-out of lending… [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, arguing that the case “finally provides the Court with a golden opportunity to restore the First Amendment liberties of the country’s public-sector workers. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, maintaining that “[i]t will be a shock if the Court upholds the status quo and allows public unions to continue pocketing millions taken from the earnings of public employees who… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether public-sector unions may require non-members to help pay for collective bargaining, arguing that “[i]n the long run, a decision for Mr. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether public-sector unions may require non-members to help pay for collective bargaining, arguing that if the court rules against the union in this case, “unions should immediately challenge their obligation to represent free-riding nonmembers as a violation of their ownrights under the First Amendment[, … [a]nd they should… [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether public-sector unions may require non-members to help pay for collective bargaining, describing the case as “a constitutional dispute conjured more or less out of thin air over the past five years by Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
American Federal of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), which was filed in 2015. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court will consider whether public-sector unions may require non-members to help pay for collective bargaining, noting that the case has “enormous financial implications for teachers’ unions. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31 (16-1466), the plaintiffs are hoping the fully constituted Court will overrule Abood v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:15 am by First Mondays
American Federation of State, Municipal and County Employees, which concerns the constitutionality of public-sector union agency fees. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 7:47 am by Tammy Binford
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Counsel 31. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which “the court will consider whether public-sector unions may require workers who are not members to help pay for collective bargaining,” “could deal a crushing blow to organized labor. [read post]