Search for: "Jason Rantanen"
Results 121 - 140
of 438
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2016, 7:44 am
By Jason Rantanen Saurabh Vishnubhakat (Texas A&M), Arti Rai (Duke) and Jay Kesan (Illinois) recently released a draft of their empirical study of Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, Strategic Decision Making in Dual PTAB and District Court Proceedings. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 12:37 pm
By Jason Rantanen Wi-Lan, Inc v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 9:59 am
By Jason Rantanen I’m excited to report that my academic institution, the University of Iowa, is hiring an in-house intellectual property attorney. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:42 pm
By Jason Rantanen Earlier this month, the Federal Circuit released a set of proposed amendments to the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice and Procedure that completely overhaul the existing rules. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:15 pm
The brief cites to Patently-O essays by Gary Griswold and Jason Rantanen (predicting an “explosion of design patent assertions and lawsuits”). = = = = = [1] U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:54 am
By Jason Rantanen I’m very much looking forward to giving the Patent Year-in-Review talk at the AIPLA annual meeting tomorrow. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:29 pm
By Jason Rantanen The USPTO recently released the data on the number of patent applications filed in Fiscal Year 2015 via its Data Visualization Center (i.e.: the Dashboard) page. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:49 pm
” In his essay on the decision, Jason Rantanen wrote that these holdings are “probably erroneous—doctrinal developments. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:07 am
By Jason Rantanen As part of my standard preparation for teaching a given doctrine in my patent law class, I like to review the relevant section of the Manual of Patent Examination and Procedure (MPEP). [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 11:19 am
As Jason Rantanen noted at Patently-O, Judge Taranto's concurrence from the denial of rehearing en banc in Halo explained that this is not the right case, but that some § 284 issues could warrant en banc review in a future case. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 2:45 pm
By Jason Rantanen Next Friday, October 2, the Iowa Intellectual Property Law Association will hold its annual conference. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:45 am
By Jason Rantanen On October 24, 2015, I’ll be giving the “Patent Law Year in Review” talk at the American Intellectual Property Law Association’s annual meeting in Washington, D.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:43 pm
By Jason Rantanen Media Rights Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 3:52 am
By Jason Rantanen The Dow Chemical Company v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:14 am
Jason Rantanen (Iowa Law) posted a nice essay this spring, Teva, Nautilus, and Change Without Change (forthcoming Stan. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 1:12 pm
IPO Law Journal, (April 6, 2015). http://www.ipo.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/griswold_an-approach.pdf [iii] Rantanen, Jason, “Apple v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
By Jason Rantanen Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
By Jason Rantanen Circuit Check Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 7:52 am
By Jason Rantanen This morning, the USPTO issued a substantial update to its December 2014 “Interim Guidance” on patent subject matter eligibility. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 10:25 am
By Jason Rantanen In my Patent Law Year in Review talk this morning at the Wisconsin Bar Association’s Tenth Annual Door County Intellectual Property Law Academy, I touched briefly on ex parte reexamination filings. [read post]
