Search for: "Jay Jurata"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2021, 7:47 am
Delrahim (which obviously does not apply to Judge Fabian Hoffmann of the Federal Court of Justice of Germany and Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe's Jay Jurata), but 68% of participants responded with "yes" to the following question:"Is there a role for antitrust to play in the debate over component-level licensing where all implementers of the standard are assured of their ability to practice the standardized the technology? [read post]
28 May 2021, 10:40 am
The other two current Board members are Rebekah Goshorn Jurata and Megan Zietsman. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:56 pm
That question already came up in my podcast a couple of months ago, where I asked DC-based antitrust attorney Jay Jurata of Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe for his thoughts on how U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:47 am
ZTE framework).I'm so grateful all four of them (in alphabetical order of last name: Professor Christian Donle of Preu Bohlig, Jay Jurata of Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe, Paul Lugard of Baker Botts, and Pat Treacy of Bristows) accepted. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:50 am
"Jay" Jurata and Emily Luken discuss the desirable and (in an increasing number of cases) undesirable effects of standard-essential patent pools in Glory Days: Do the Anticompetitive Risks of Standards-Essential Patent Pools Outweigh Their Procompetitive Benefits? [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
" (emphasis in original)That just perfectly illustrates the importance of the royalty base.What makes the refusal to extend exhaustive FRAND licenses to component makers even harder to justify in the automotive industry is that the telematics control units (TCUs) sold by Tier 1 suppliers (the ones that directly sell to the car makers) come with pretty much the same functionality as a phone, apart from the screen.Two Tier 1 suppliers--Continental Automotive Systems (whose FRAND/antitrust lawsuit… [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
Jurata and Professor Donle on the other side. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:57 am
Qualcomm Ruling: Key Holdings, Next Steps, Global ImpactModerator: Jay Jurata (Partner, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe)Judge Lucy H. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 9:43 am
When I heard of Professor Donle's component licensing antitrust action, I invited him to speak at my Brussels conference on November 12 (that's already the week after next), and he thankfully accepted, so he will share a panel with Bristows' Pat Treacy, BakerBotts' Paul Lugard, and Orrick's Jay Jurata. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
His focus at next month's conference will be on the economics of patent licensing.John "Jay" Jurata is an Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe partner and the leader of the firm's global antitrust practice. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:17 am
"Jay" Jurata (whom I previously mentioned in connection with a paper on the UK Unwired Planet global FRAND rate case), noted an irony:"Even Qualcomm believes patent hold-up is real! [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:04 am
There's also the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), but above all, let's not forget about the judges.An article (PDF) written by two Washington, DC-based antitrust lawyers, Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe's John "Jay" Jurata, Jr. and Emily Luken, for the Global Competition Review explains that Mr. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:32 am
John (“Jay”) Jurata, Jr. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 11:56 am
Roger Parloff, senior editor of Fortune (part of the CNN Money network), also advocated a veto in an opinion piece, as did Orrick Herrington Sutcliffe partner Jay Jurata, a leading Washington, DC antitrust lawyer.I'm sure that it wasn't an easy decision to veto the only significant win Samsung had scored against Apple in the earth-spanning patent dispute between the two companies, considering the special relationship between the U.S. and South Korea, but the USTR's letter makes… [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 8:27 am
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe's Jay Jurata, Monte Cooper and Neel Chatterjee authored this analysis, which is also quoted in this Reuters story and says, among other things, that "by establishing elaborate procedures that Google must follow before invoking an 'unwilling licensee' exception to the general rule, the decree might have the unintended consequence of encouraging opportunistic behavior by SEP owners in an attempt to portray companies as 'unwilling licensees.'" [read post]
