Search for: "Jean v. Civil Service Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2017, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"* Oliver also argued that the hearing panel failed to consider the retaliatory motive of the disciplinary charges in violation of Civil Service Law §75-b, the so-called "whistle blower statute. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:13 am by Inside Privacy
” Discussion resumed in December and ended in confusion after the legal service of the Council declared the Commission proposal illegal. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Civil Rights Commission, and the author, most recently, of History Teaches Us to Resist: How Progressive Movements Have Succeeded in Challenging Times, will help lead “an ‘organizing for change’ panel discussion September 22 at the Milford Theater, 114 Catherine St., Milford, [PA]. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm by Lindsey Williams
”I quote that final line because of a December 15, 2011 Court of Appeals decision from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, styled “DeGuelle v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The rulings cited the Supreme Court’s landmark civil rights-era case, New York Times v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Elina Saxena
The European Court of Justice ruled against the Safe Harbor framework in Schrems v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:29 pm
Benn was co-counsel for Johnson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am by Ben
” and “Copyright owners could institute civil suit against copyright offenders, apart from the criminal suit the commission normally institutes against such offenders. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan has held that the US Government cannot take over the defence of the libel claim against President Trump brought by E Jean Carroll. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm by Melina Padron
British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWHC 235 (Admin) (14 February 2011) High court: “treatment for termination of pregnancy” includes taking of abortion pills so they must be taken in hospital. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
He brought a civil rights claim for unlawful discrimination on the basis of religion in violation of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE (Tex. 2009) The Supreme's June 19, 2009 Releases:Barr v. [read post]