Search for: "Jed Handelsman Shugerman" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2008, 12:02 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard Law School, has published A Watershed Moment: Reversals of Tort Theory in the Nineteenth Century in the on-line Journal of Tort Law. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm by Dan Ernst
It's just out from Harvard University Press: The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America, by Jed Handelsman Shugerman. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:15 pm by Dan Ernst
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard Law School, has posted Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review, which is forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review 123 (2010). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Hurwitz (Western Michigan University) review, here and here, Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The People’s Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America (Harvard University Press, 2012).Hat tip: The Faculty Lounge [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Jack Beermann
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Dependent Origins of Independent Agencies: The Interstate Commerce Commission, the Tenure of Office Act, and the Rise of Modern Campaign Finance, 31 J.L. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
  The legal historians Gautham Rao and Jed Handelsman Shugerman have now replied to Blackman and Tillman in Slate. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 5:35 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court legend John Paul Stevens’ Bill Clinton decision set a judicial standard that’s now fading; While many cursed Stevens’ opinion during the Clinton impeachment process, we would be wise to recognize the judicial legend’s good judgment and nonpartisanship today”: Law professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman has this essay online at NBC News. [read post]
6 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, and Gautham Rao, American University, have posted Emoluments, Zones of Interests, and Political Questions: A Cautionary Tale, which appears in the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 45 (2018): 651-670:As the Supreme Court addresses partisan gerrymanders in 2018, the “political question” doctrine is facing intense scrutiny. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard Law School, has posted The Creation of the Department of Justice: Professionalization Without Civil Rights or Civil Service, which is forthcoming in the fall in volume 66 of the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Engel reviews Justin Crowe, Building the Judiciary: Law, Courts and the Politics of Institutional Development (2012) and Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America (2012). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted The Dependent Origins of Independent Agencies: The Interstate Commerce Commission and the Rise of Modern Campaign Finance and Capture. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:44 am by Joe Hodnicki
Leib and Jed Handelsman Shugerman’s Fiduciary Constitutionalism and ‘Faithful Execution’: Two Legal Conclusions, Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, Forthcoming, “explores the Constitution’s requirement that the President “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” and the requirement that he take an oath to “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:30 am by ernst
Leib, and Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, have posted “Faithful Execution” and Article II:Article II of the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 8:31 am by Joe Hodnicki
Leib & Jed Handelsman Shugerman, ‘Faithful Execution’ and Article II, Harvard Law Review, Forthcoming: Article II of the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted "The Decisions of 1789 Were Non-Unitary: Removal by Judiciary and the Imaginary Unitary Executive," it two installments, Part 1 and Part 2. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has published The Decisions of 1789 Were Non-Unitary: Removal by Judiciary and the Imaginary Unitary Executive (Part II) as Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3597496. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm by Christine Corcos
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has published The Decisions of 1789 Were Non-Unitary: Removal by Judiciary and the Imaginary Unitary Executive (Part II) as Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3597496. [read post]