Search for: "Jed Handelsman Shugerman"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2008, 12:02 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard Law School, has published A Watershed Moment: Reversals of Tort Theory in the Nineteenth Century in the on-line Journal of Tort Law. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:15 pm
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard Law School, has posted Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review, which is forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review 123 (2010). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
It's just out from Harvard University Press: The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America, by Jed Handelsman Shugerman. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
Hurwitz (Western Michigan University) review, here and here, Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The People’s Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America (Harvard University Press, 2012).Hat tip: The Faculty Lounge [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:46 pm
" Gautham Rao and Jed Handelsman Shugerman have this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:30 am
Rozenshtein (University of Minnesota Law School) & Jed Handelsman Shugerman (Fordham Law School) have posted January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution (37 Constitutional Commentary (forthcoming 2023)) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:51 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman (Harvard University - Harvard Law School) has posted "Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review" (Harvard Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:44 pm
" Law professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:56 pm
" Law professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 11:27 am
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota Law School and Fordham Law School Date Posted: 31 Oct 2022... [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
Rozenshtein, University of Minnesota Law School, and Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, are publishing January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution in volume 37 of Constitutional Commentary (2023). [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:59 am
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota Law School and Fordham Law School Date Posted: 31 Oct 2022... [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota... [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Dependent Origins of Independent Agencies: The Interstate Commerce Commission, the Tenure of Office Act, and the Rise of Modern Campaign Finance, 31 J.L. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 5:35 pm
“Supreme Court legend John Paul Stevens’ Bill Clinton decision set a judicial standard that’s now fading; While many cursed Stevens’ opinion during the Clinton impeachment process, we would be wise to recognize the judicial legend’s good judgment and nonpartisanship today”: Law professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman has this essay online at NBC News. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
The legal historians Gautham Rao and Jed Handelsman Shugerman have now replied to Blackman and Tillman in Slate. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 7:41 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman in NYT oped: About a year ago, when Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, indicted former President Donald Trump, I was critical of the case and called it an embarrassment. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 9:05 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted Presidential Removal: The Marbury Problem and the Madison Solutions, which appears in volume 89 of the Fordham Law Review (2021):James Madison (LC)Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted Professionals, Politicos, and Crony Attorneys General: A Historical Sketch of the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2018, 9:30 pm
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, and Gautham Rao, American University, have posted Emoluments, Zones of Interests, and Political Questions: A Cautionary Tale, which appears in the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 45 (2018): 651-670:As the Supreme Court addresses partisan gerrymanders in 2018, the “political question” doctrine is facing intense scrutiny. [read post]
