Search for: "Jed Handelsman Shugerman"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2008, 12:02 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard Law School, has published A Watershed Moment: Reversals of Tort Theory in the Nineteenth Century in the on-line Journal of Tort Law. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
It's just out from Harvard University Press: The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America, by Jed Handelsman Shugerman. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:15 pm
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard Law School, has posted Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review, which is forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review 123 (2010). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
Hurwitz (Western Michigan University) review, here and here, Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The People’s Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America (Harvard University Press, 2012).Hat tip: The Faculty Lounge [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:46 pm
" Gautham Rao and Jed Handelsman Shugerman have this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:44 pm
" Law professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:56 pm
" Law professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Dependent Origins of Independent Agencies: The Interstate Commerce Commission, the Tenure of Office Act, and the Rise of Modern Campaign Finance, 31 J.L. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 5:35 pm
“Supreme Court legend John Paul Stevens’ Bill Clinton decision set a judicial standard that’s now fading; While many cursed Stevens’ opinion during the Clinton impeachment process, we would be wise to recognize the judicial legend’s good judgment and nonpartisanship today”: Law professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman has this essay online at NBC News. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
The legal historians Gautham Rao and Jed Handelsman Shugerman have now replied to Blackman and Tillman in Slate. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 9:05 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted Presidential Removal: The Marbury Problem and the Madison Solutions, which appears in volume 89 of the Fordham Law Review (2021):James Madison (LC)Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted Professionals, Politicos, and Crony Attorneys General: A Historical Sketch of the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2018, 9:30 pm
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, and Gautham Rao, American University, have posted Emoluments, Zones of Interests, and Political Questions: A Cautionary Tale, which appears in the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 45 (2018): 651-670:As the Supreme Court addresses partisan gerrymanders in 2018, the “political question” doctrine is facing intense scrutiny. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard Law School, has posted The Creation of the Department of Justice: Professionalization Without Civil Rights or Civil Service, which is forthcoming in the fall in volume 66 of the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm
Engel reviews Justin Crowe, Building the Judiciary: Law, Courts and the Politics of Institutional Development (2012) and Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America (2012). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted The Dependent Origins of Independent Agencies: The Interstate Commerce Commission and the Rise of Modern Campaign Finance and Capture. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:30 am
Leib, and Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, have posted “Faithful Execution” and Article II:Article II of the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted "The Decisions of 1789 Were Non-Unitary: Removal by Judiciary and the Imaginary Unitary Executive," it two installments, Part 1 and Part 2. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has published The Decisions of 1789 Were Non-Unitary: Removal by Judiciary and the Imaginary Unitary Executive (Part II) as Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3597496. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has published The Decisions of 1789 Were Non-Unitary: Removal by Judiciary and the Imaginary Unitary Executive (Part II) as Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3597496. [read post]
