Search for: "Jed Handelsman Shugerman" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2008, 12:02 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard Law School, has published A Watershed Moment: Reversals of Tort Theory in the Nineteenth Century in the on-line Journal of Tort Law. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:15 pm by Dan Ernst
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard Law School, has posted Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review, which is forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review 123 (2010). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm by Dan Ernst
It's just out from Harvard University Press: The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America, by Jed Handelsman Shugerman. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Hurwitz (Western Michigan University) review, here and here, Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The People’s Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America (Harvard University Press, 2012).Hat tip: The Faculty Lounge [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Rozenshtein (University of Minnesota Law School) & Jed Handelsman Shugerman (Fordham Law School) have posted January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution (37 Constitutional Commentary (forthcoming 2023)) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:51 am by Lawrence Solum
Jed Handelsman Shugerman (Harvard University - Harvard Law School) has posted "Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review" (Harvard Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:59 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota Law School and Fordham Law School Date Posted: 31 Oct 2022... [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by Media Law Prof
Rozenshtein, University of Minnesota Law School, and Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, are publishing January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution in volume 37 of Constitutional Commentary (2023). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 10:32 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota... [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 11:27 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota Law School and Fordham Law School Date Posted: 31 Oct 2022... [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 3:30 am by Jack Beermann
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, The Dependent Origins of Independent Agencies: The Interstate Commerce Commission, the Tenure of Office Act, and the Rise of Modern Campaign Finance, 31 J.L. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
  The legal historians Gautham Rao and Jed Handelsman Shugerman have now replied to Blackman and Tillman in Slate. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 5:35 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court legend John Paul Stevens’ Bill Clinton decision set a judicial standard that’s now fading; While many cursed Stevens’ opinion during the Clinton impeachment process, we would be wise to recognize the judicial legend’s good judgment and nonpartisanship today”: Law professor Jed Handelsman Shugerman has this essay online at NBC News. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 7:41 am by Rick Hasen
Jed Handelsman Shugerman in NYT oped: About a year ago, when Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, indicted former President Donald Trump, I was critical of the case and called it an embarrassment. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 9:05 am by ernst
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted Presidential Removal: The Marbury Problem and the Madison Solutions, which appears in volume 89 of the Fordham Law Review (2021):James Madison (LC)Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted Professionals, Politicos, and Crony Attorneys General: A Historical Sketch of the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, and Gautham Rao, American University, have posted Emoluments, Zones of Interests, and Political Questions: A Cautionary Tale, which appears in the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 45 (2018): 651-670:As the Supreme Court addresses partisan gerrymanders in 2018, the “political question” doctrine is facing intense scrutiny. [read post]