Search for: "Jed Handelsman Shugerman"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
This repository contains a collection of information for researchers, journalists, educators, scholars, and the public at large. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:29 am
This repository contains a collection of information for researchers, journalists, educators, scholars, and the public at large. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This is Volume IV of the major questions doctrine (“MQD”) reading list. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
Rozenshtein & Jed Handelsman Shugerman, January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution, 37 Const. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota... [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:59 am
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota Law School and Fordham Law School Date Posted: 31 Oct 2022... [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm
Columbia Global Freedom of Expression seeks to contribute to the development of an integrated and progressive jurisprudence and understanding on freedom of expression and information around the world. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 11:27 am
Rozenshtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman University of Minnesota Law School and Fordham Law School Date Posted: 31 Oct 2022... [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
Rozenshtein, University of Minnesota Law School, and Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, are publishing January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution in volume 37 of Constitutional Commentary (2023). [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:30 am
Rozenshtein (University of Minnesota Law School) & Jed Handelsman Shugerman (Fordham Law School) have posted January 6, Ambiguously Inciting Speech, and the Overt-Acts Solution (37 Constitutional Commentary (forthcoming 2023)) on SSRN. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Rozenhtein and Jed Handelsman Shugerman discussed how Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony to the Jan. 6 select committee changed their minds about indicting former President Donald Trump. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 6:52 am
Farber on The Misuse of History to Undercut the Modern Regulatory State (Regulatory Review).Jed Handelsman Shugerman reviews David M. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman published a book review of David M. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:09 pm
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted Removal of Context: Blackstone, Limited Monarchy, and the Limits of Unitary Originalism, which is forthcoming in the Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities:William Blackstone (NYPL)This article is part of a series on Article II, questioning the unitary theory’s three pillars: the Executive Vesting Clause, the Take Care Clause (or the “Faithful Execution” clauses), and the Decision of 1789 (or more… [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 4:58 am
(A recent paper by Jed Shugerman and Jed Handelsman takes a close look at the evidence.) [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 9:05 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted Presidential Removal: The Marbury Problem and the Madison Solutions, which appears in volume 89 of the Fordham Law Review (2021):James Madison (LC)Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has posted Professionals, Politicos, and Crony Attorneys General: A Historical Sketch of the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Jed Handelsman Shugerman discussed the first Congress’ “Decision of 1789,” which concerned the president’s power to remove officers. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 pm
Jed Handelsman Shugerman argued that presidential removal power should be subject to more congressional control than recent Supreme Court decisions have provided for. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm
Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Fordham Law School, has published The Decisions of 1789 Were Non-Unitary: Removal by Judiciary and the Imaginary Unitary Executive (Part II) as Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3597496. [read post]
