Search for: "Jefferson County v. Reach"
Results 41 - 60
of 207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
In Foley’s view, the Jeffersonian goal underlying the Twelfth Amendment of 1804 was not merely to cure the mischief arising from the fact that electors were obligated to cast two “undifferentiated” votes for president—the great misstep that led to the Burr-Jefferson tie of 1800 and to Hamilton’s several attempts to throw votes away from John Adams. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm
Sensationalized coverage of high-profile trials may not reach jurors, but it reaches voters and DAs react to it. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
McKee v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
(Superior Court of Stanislaus County, No. 624500, William A. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:17 am
Jefferson County, No. 09-0326 (DDB). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
Hudson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:45 pm
Jefferson County, the Supreme Court reversed an Alabama Supreme Court decision that barred a group of taxpayers from challenging a tax that had been upheld in a prior suit involving different taxpayers. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:51 pm
JUDICIAL TORT REFORM: Trammell Crow v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am
While a majority of judges have upheld its constitutionality, a Cook County circuit court judge held the statute was unconstitutional in Hyland, etc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
Hudnell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:07 pm
Interestingly, in another case involving a different set of facts, the Court recently held (in an opinion by Chief Jefferson, who agrees with the holding in JCW v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Drew Kerrins v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
The court, by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Ira B. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 1:13 pm
Charles Hospital in Port Jefferson. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Buron v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:00 am
Squire v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:00 am
Squire v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:44 am
Segovia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:47 am
The affidavit of the plaintiff's process server constitutes prima facie evidence of proper service (see Matter of Perskin v Bassaragh, 73 AD3d 1073; Prospect Park Mgt., LLC v Beatty, 73 AD3d 885; Pezolano v Incorporated City of Glen Cove, 71 AD3d 970, 971; Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC v Reisman, 55 AD3d 524, 525; Jefferson v Netusil, 44 AD3d 621). [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:43 am
The affidavit of the plaintiff's process server constitutes prima facie evidence of proper service (see Matter of Perskin v Bassaragh, 73 AD3d 1073; Prospect Park Mgt., LLC v Beatty, 73 AD3d 885; Pezolano v Incorporated City of Glen Cove, 71 AD3d 970, 971; Cavalry Portfolio Servs., LLC v Reisman, 55 AD3d 524, 525; Jefferson v Netusil, 44 AD3d 621). [read post]
