Search for: "Jefferson v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 895
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am by Jon Hyman
We're doing DEI wrong — via Business Insider Can states legally ban "woke" training in the workplace? [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
The Colorado state trial court held that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:44 am by SHG
There have been precious few decisions from the United States Supreme Court where the opinion of Justice Sam Alito didn’t cause me paroxysms of pain. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am by Scott Bomboy
“Maybe put most boldly, I think that the question that you have to confront is why a single state should decide who gets to be president of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch was the most interested questioner on whether the President was an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:42 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, a 5-4 decision from 2012 in which the Court concluded that many state actions to enforce federal immigration laws are preempted. [read post]