Search for: "Jencks v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am
The case helped bring an end to the death penalty in New York and was cited by the United States Supreme Court in the 1966 Miranda v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:33 am
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972). [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:57 am
United States, 353 U.S. 657 (1957) in which it afforded broad discovery opportunities in federal criminal cases. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:30 pm
United States, and giving defendants access to law enforcement reports in Jencks v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2012), the D.C. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:33 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
United States, 353 U.S. 53 (1957)”. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:23 am
In Miller v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:10 pm
“A recent non-published opinion [Florida Criminal Defense Cyber Crime Attorney Lawyer for your convenience we have published it here ] from the District of New Jersey (United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:12 pm
The United States Constitution requires that in all criminal cases, the prosecution must disclose to the defendant all evidence that proves guilt, as well as all evidence that proves innocence. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:58 am
Section 3500(b), part of the Jencks Act, provides that After a witness called by the United States has testified on direct examination, the court shall, on motion of the defendant, order the United States to produce any statement... [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:57 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 4:52 am
The Second Circuit upheld the ruling in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
