Search for: "Jenness v. Little"
Results 1 - 20
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2014, 8:42 am
Supreme Court is hearing argument today in Jennings v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 3:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
Today’s argument docket features Jennings v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
However, little is known about the circumstances surrounding this event, or Claire Palley herself. [read post]
12 May 2019, 10:10 am
"South Carolina Supreme Court: Web-Based Emails Are Not "Backup"In 2012, the South Carolina Supreme Court, in Jennings v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
12 Apr 2007, 9:41 am
After Justice Lemuel Shaw's decision in Stebins v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
Jennings v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 8:45 am
Dimaya, Jennings v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm
United States, and I have very little of substance to add to Jen Daskal’s thorough analysis over at Just Security, or Marty Lederman’s addendum thereto. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 3:10 pm
The discussion focused on the 11th Circuit’s recent decision in Myhra v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
Shannon Togawa Mercer argued that recent British government resignations signal that there’s little hope for a “hard” Brexit. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:08 am
Jennings v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 3:46 am
(For a little different take, see U.S. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 10:58 am
Citing Wong v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:32 pm
Tendayi Achiume, The In- or Ex-clusiveness of International Law Namira Negm, The In/Ex-clusiveness of International Law: Some Remarks from the Concluding Panel of the 17th Annual Conference of the European Society of International Law Alfred Soons, Remarks at the Welcome Reception of the 17th ESIL Annual Conference Review EssaysMavluda Sattorova, Greed and Grievance: Corporations, States and International Investment Law in Times of Conflict, reviewing Daria Davitti,… [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:02 am
(District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:21 am
The panel says “his allegations do not support a plausible inference that the government coerced Meta” because the alleged jawboning statements (by Jen Psaki) lacked any threats or incentives. [read post]
Texas' new sex offender law misplaces focus on stranger danger, could make victimization more likely
21 Oct 2007, 11:25 pm
UPDATE: Michael from Corrections Sentencing linked to this post and offered caveats that I 100% endorse, along with some free advice for Texas pols:Only one little quibble, Grits. [read post]
