Search for: "Jenness v. Little" Results 1 - 20 of 147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 8:42 am by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court is hearing argument today in Jennings v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Today’s argument docket features Jennings v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
However, little is known about the circumstances surrounding this event, or Claire Palley herself. [read post]
12 May 2019, 10:10 am by Jack Pringle
"South Carolina Supreme Court: Web-Based Emails Are Not "Backup"In 2012, the South Carolina Supreme Court, in Jennings v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 9:41 am
After Justice Lemuel Shaw's decision in Stebins v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm by Steve Vladeck
United States, and I have very little of substance to add to Jen Daskal’s thorough analysis over at Just Security, or Marty Lederman’s addendum thereto. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 3:10 pm by Mitu Gulati
The discussion focused on the 11th Circuit’s recent decision in Myhra v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am by Mikhaila Fogel, Matthew Kahn
 Shannon Togawa Mercer argued that recent British government resignations signal that there’s little hope for a “hard” Brexit. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:32 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
 Tendayi Achiume, The In- or Ex-clusiveness of International Law Namira Negm, The In/Ex-clusiveness of International Law: Some Remarks from the Concluding Panel of the 17th Annual Conference of the European Society of International Law Alfred Soons, Remarks at the Welcome Reception of the 17th ESIL Annual Conference Review EssaysMavluda Sattorova, Greed and Grievance: Corporations, States and International Investment Law in Times of Conflict, reviewing Daria Davitti,… [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:21 am by Eric Goldman
The panel says “his allegations do not support a plausible inference that the government coerced Meta” because the alleged jawboning statements (by Jen Psaki) lacked any threats or incentives. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 11:25 pm
UPDATE: Michael from Corrections Sentencing linked to this post and offered caveats that I 100% endorse, along with some free advice for Texas pols:Only one little quibble, Grits. [read post]