Search for: "Jenness v. Little" Results 41 - 60 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2019, 10:10 am by Jack Pringle
"South Carolina Supreme Court: Web-Based Emails Are Not "Backup"In 2012, the South Carolina Supreme Court, in Jennings v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Schachtman
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Germany The Daily Telegraph reports that Jens Maier, a German MP from the nationalist Alternative for Germany party (AfD) has been ordered to pay €15,000 (£13,200) compensation for defamation over a tweet which described the son of Boris Becker as a “little half-negro”. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
Orin Kerr flagged two draft chapters he wrote on implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:02 am by Andrew Hamm
He was not able to avoid the issue in Buck v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:03 am by Hilary Hurd, Elena Chachko
” In response to President Trump’s announcement, Jens Stoltenberg, NATO Secretary General, again backed U.S. allegations that Russia has violated the INF. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 12:50 pm by Adam Feldman
According to Professor Rory Little, the court’s merits docket is currently filled with criminal law cases. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
Eventually, the Supreme Court settled many of the issues about the Scopes case in 1968, in a decision called Epperson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am by Mikhaila Fogel, Matthew Kahn
 Shannon Togawa Mercer argued that recent British government resignations signal that there’s little hope for a “hard” Brexit. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:42 am by Mark Walsh
Ginsburg’s dissent from the bench is the second of the term, with Breyer having read from his dissent in Jennings v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:21 am by Adam Feldman
These include one for Justice Elena Kagan (she recused herself from Jennings v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
The other holds that, for reasons ranging from the power of incumbency to low-information voting to agency problems in government, the fact that most voters do not, say, favor a property tax increase provides little assurance that one will not be imposed on them.[8] It is the latter theory that is at the heart of the property tax limitation regime: the idea that, if elected officials will not listen to the voters, then the voters must take matters into their own hands. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am by Amy Howe
The justices issued that ruling late last month, holding in Jennings v. [read post]