Search for: "Jester v. State"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2019, 6:47 am
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Violation of probation Under the Justice Reinvestment Act of 2016 (“JRA”), the first technical violation of probation merits no more than 15 days of imprisonment—unless a judge finds that the defendant would pose a risk to public safety, a “victim,” or a witness. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
My nomination for the most clever judicial opinion is United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:13 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:00 pm
The state’s standing argument didn’t fly, in light of the recent US Supreme Court case of Byrd v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
Except, on Friday, Judge Cathy Bissoon from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania concluded EEOC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:19 pm
Foxworth v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:45 pm
I returned to the office today, haven't had time to read the SCOTUS opinions in Cuomo v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:55 am
Because he filed in state court, I can’t readily get the complaint as I could in a federal case. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 2:16 pm
They say they’re not laying off any officers, so the move could (v slightly) help with staffing issues. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:05 pm
ASARCO LLC (9th Cir. 2014), decided as to Title VII but with logic that I think is applicable to libel cases (see Jester v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Jester (1947-1949), and Dan Moody (1927-1931). [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 3:46 pm
Jester. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:45 am
And that is based on the recent legal battle over New York's 2007 amendments to our attorney ethics rules in Alexander v Cahill. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
I, personally, find Article V particularly interesting. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:20 am
Supreme Court’s July 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:19 am
And, there's the puppet theater--the Parliament jesters foist on the somnambulant public. . . [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
