Search for: "Jewell v. Price"
Results 41 - 60
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2021, 11:45 am
US v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Webb v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 2:30 am
See Faber v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
As per In re: Signet Jewelers Limited Securities Litigation: [J]udicial approval of a class action settlement is a two-step process. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:30 am
Latham v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:34 pm
Given the limitation inherent in the facts alleged in the complaint, the case, Allure Jewelers, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:06 pm
(Jewell's Lessee v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:00 am
In Allure Jewelers, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 12:57 am
Lewisham, like so many local authorities, are selling off the crown jewels to keep services running. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Around the time that Sweet and Maxwell, whose historical motto was Lux Gentium Lex (not “soap for legal gentlemen”), as the jewel in the crown of its then parent company, was acquired in 1986 by what was then International Thomson Corporation, one of the key ITO executives justified the high price paid, commenting, “you only get one crack at this sort of opportunity….we were quite bold to offer the price we did…., but then Sweet &… [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 3:24 pm
Riley got what she wanted, and at a price with which she could surely live. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am
“Ad” is created by SI + Jewel. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:23 am
Roberto Coin, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
(The sales of the infringing product competed with the sales of the infringed product, thereby lowering the price.) [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
Jewel v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:08 am
State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
Jewell, a related case which is presently stayed pending resolution of United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 8:58 am
Jewell, a related case which is presently stayed pending resolution of United States v. [read post]
