Search for: "Jews for Jesus v. Brodsky"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2022, 11:40 am
The post Jews for Jesus* v. free speech: update appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:05 am
Brodsky is not part of a Jews for Jesus organization does not require any particular “sophistication. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
It must be, because this story is being fairly well ignored — as the Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:44 am
Obviously he does not rule like the court in Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 11:49 am
Republished by Blog Post PromoterNice little bit of journalism here: Apple Inc. scores trademark coup with Beatles’ label logos Related items SUPER BOWL® Trademark Watch and Contest I Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Originally posted 2006-01-22 12:59:35. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
There are complex and controversial issues here involving the intersection between trademark use and parody, and what constitutes commerical use of a trademark in a primarily religious/political speech context, similar to the issues raised by cases such as PETA v Doughney and JEWS FOR JESUS v Brodsky Which issues I will not address in this post today. [read post]
28 May 2014, 10:48 pm
Sure, courts have tripped over themselves over the issue of what is a use in commerce, even ruling in Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 8:10 am
(Did I mention that Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:48 am
Bucci and Jews for Jesus v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:28 pm
Bucci and Jews for Jesus v. [read post]