Search for: "Jim Harper" Results 261 - 280 of 322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2010, 10:55 am by Steven Titch
Since the rather short-sighted actions of Madison River Communications, a small North Carolina competitive local exchange carrier, hardly generate the emotions or headlines that an AT&T or Comcast would, network neutrality activists were left scrounging for any “censorship” tidbit they could find, even if it had little to do with the Internet access (Jim Harper’s recent podcast critiques recent claims of neutrality violations). [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:57 pm
“Given his role in REAL ID, Tom Davis would not be a good choice for privacy, which is something that President Obama specifically promised to protect in his remarks on the cyber security strategy,” says Jim Harper, the director of information policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:55 am by Conor McEvily
  The ACLU’s Blog of Rights, Jim Harper at Cato@Liberty, and Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy all discuss the case and the briefs filed in it, while Wired reports that the inventor of the Global Positioning System is urging the Court to rule against the government in the case. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 am by Goldberg Jones
Atticus Finch—To Kill a Mockingbird Author Harper Lee reportedly based Atticus Finch, the lead character in her classic novel To Kill a Mockingbird, on her own father. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:19 pm
The Harper government reasoned that such tax cuts would help make Canada one of the world’s most attractive destinations for international business investment. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
J is for the Jewish New Year cards Prime Minister Stephen Harper sent to thousands of Canadians. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Jim Crow” laws taking rights away from blacks were enacted in one state of the South after another. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:19 pm
The Harper government reasoned that such tax cuts would help make Canada one of the world’s most attractive destinations for international business investment. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Over at Appellate Daily, Michelle Olsen reports on a pending cert. petition involving Miranda warnings, and Jim Harper of Cato At Liberty reports on a recent amicus brief in Florida v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:00 am by Ryan Radia
See, for example, Jim Harper’s excellent 2008 article in the American University Law Review.) [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Lisa Soronen at the IMLA Appellate Practice Blog, Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, and Jim Harper at Cato at Liberty. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
Schwinn of Constitutional Law Prof Blog, AFP, Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal, Jim Harper of Cato@Liberty, David Kravets of Wired, and Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:49 am by larrywalker
Wert, and Some Things I Wish We Wouldn’t Forget by Jim Minter. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:37 pm
-elect Jim Himes (D-Conn.) is interested in serving on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Harper, SCOTUS rejected the most extreme version of ISL, but in December 2020, it was at least theoretically possible that the Court would accept a broad version of ISL in a case that properly teed it up.What can we learn from the amicus brief by Mike Johnson and the other 125 Republicans? [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:33 am by Adam Thierer
Darknet & the Decline of Practical Obscurity In the context of personal privacy, the net result of all of this — to quote Jim Harper’s excellent 2006 book Identity Crisis — is the “decline of practical obscurity. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Jim Gibson: “authorize” could be read differently: licensing something that will obviously infringe should be deemed a 106 violation. [read post]