Search for: "Jim Lindgren" Results 181 - 200 of 229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2010, 7:51 am by Walter Olson
Other views: Ted and Carter at Point of Law, Ilya Somin, Jonathan Adler, and Jim Lindgren at Volokh. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 9:30 am by Jim Lindgren
[Philip Hamburger's Op-Ed at the Federalist on a case to be argued next week] On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm by Jim Lindgren
[What is meant by "each State by the Legislature thereof" that prescribes how to conduct elections?] [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:14 am by Jim Lindgren
[Round 3 in the debate between Hamburger and Somin over the First Amendment and Murthy] Philip Hamburger, a professor at Columbia, is the CEO of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, which represents most of the individual plaintiffs (mostly scientists) in Murthy v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 8:02 am
Jim Lindgren has more thoughts.In all fairness to Senator Obama, McCain has used the expression too. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:21 pm
Here are some comments & links from around the blogosphere:Analyis of Heller by Lawrence Solum (or scroll down)Initial Thoughts on Heller by Orin Kerr & Key Limitations of Heller by Orin Kerr The Second Amendment and State and Local Laws by Eugene Volokh My Sense of the Bottom Line from Heller by Tom Goldstein Heller Discussion Board: "Clarity is in the Eye of the Beholder by Alan Morrison Heller, Justice Steven's Dissent, and the Historian's Brief by Jim… [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 3:16 pm
"Deposition videos you have to see to believe" Jim Lindgren's two posts on the climate change hockey stick graph Ilya Somin's post Is Ayn Rand Bad for Libertarianism? [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 9:18 am
Among the leaders of the movement for an end to life tenure for Supreme Court Justices are Steven Calabresi and Jim Lindgren (both of the Northwestern University School of Law) and Roger Cramton (Cornell University Law School) and Paul Carrington (Duke University Law School). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:15 pm by Mark Tushnet
But, as Jim Lindgren’s comments indicate, that’s not how things look to Federalist Society sorts, where what to me is the center-left is incredibly radical leftism. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:48 pm
I learned that law prof Jim Lindgren is arguing at the Volohk Conspiracy that the Duke women’s lacrosse team deserves campus service awards for showing solidarity with the male Duke lacrosse players who were accused of rape and other crimes. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 10:52 am
More: Jim Lindgren at Volokh Conspiracy skewers an appalling report on health care “myths” which received, but did not deserve, the imprimatur of Indiana University. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 6:38 am
FSU's own ADR, Jim Rossi (visiting at Harvard this spring), has played an extraordinary role in intellectual life and institution-building at FSU, but I don't think anyone, including Jim, views the ADR's role here as encompassing the kind of intense mentorship that might be going on elsewhere. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 3:00 pm
Update: Also take a look at Jim Lindgren's post, excerpting Bjorn Lomborg's critique. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 5:49 am
UPDATE: Read this post from Jim Lindgren, too. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 9:15 pm
At lunch, when Northwestern lawprof Jim Lindgren (Volokh Conspiracy) kindly suggested I join his table, I found myself seated between David Lat (Above the Law) and Ann Althouse; the rest of the table consisted of NYLS professors Jethro Lieberman (The Litigious Society) and Arthur Leonard, and publisher/editor Bernard Hibbitts of Jurist. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 2:38 am
" Jim Lindgren liked the text. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:06 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
Second, like Jim Lindgren reading an essay by Michael Bellesiles, I'm getting twinges of doubt about this story. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 12:08 am by David Friedman
For details, see this post by Jim Lindgren, who teaches law at Northwestern.That so many observers took it for granted that O'Donnell was demonstrating her ignorance rather than theirs is testimony to the power of that particular civic myth. [read post]