Search for: "Jim Lindgren" Results 181 - 200 of 229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2008, 6:14 pm
JIM LINDGREN SUGGESTS that the New York Times' report that the University of Chicago offered Barack Obama a faculty position with tenure upon hiring is wrong: "I have now talked to four members of the University of Chicago law faculty, including at least one of Obamaâ € ™s campaign donors, and all four of them say that they do not remember voting Barack Obama a tenured or tenure-track offer. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:19 pm
(AP Photo/Obama for America) Then, last night, Jim Lindgren, another Volokh voice (how many are there?) [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 8:07 pm
Co-blogger Jim Lindgren has done an excellent job of criticizing the "Service Nation" proposal for up to two years mandatory "national service," eventually to be imposed on all Americans.... [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 9:12 am
Jim Lindgren objects to a regime of mandatory community service.Let's hope that the Supreme Court would not permit Service Nation's move backwards to a more feudal relationship between ordinary people and the people who govern them. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 7:53 pm
FROM JIM LINDGREN: Thoughts on Barack Obama's proposed "Civilian National Security Force. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 4:52 am
JIM LINDGREN: "Personally, I would prefer that, should Obama clearly pivot on what to do in Iraq, he not be attacked by either the left or the right for flip-flopping, but rather commended for responding to new realities. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:24 am
" Plus, Jim Lindgren on Jamie Gorelick and Fannie Mae. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 7:19 pm
JIM LINDGREN: A second look at the effect of the D.C. gun ban. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 6:24 pm
Some related thoughts from Jim Lindgren. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:41 pm
David Bernstein notes his agreement, in a Volokh Conspiracy post entitled "The Scholarly Nature of Heller," with Jim Lindgren that "the opinions in Heller are very scholarly, especially with reference to historical sources. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
Finally, as usual, Volokh Conspiracy has a number of insightful posts on the topic, including these by Eugene Volokh, Randy Barnett, Ilya Somin, Dale Carpenter, and Jim Lindgren. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:15 am
JIM LINDGREN ON THE DEATH PENALTY AND CHILD RAPE: Yet the Court shouldnâ € ™t talk about following a â € œnational consensusâ €  [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 12:57 am
JIM LINDGREN: "I have been reading Justice Breyerâ € ™s dissent in Heller. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 4:21 pm
Here are some comments & links from around the blogosphere:Analyis of Heller by Lawrence Solum (or scroll down)Initial Thoughts on Heller by Orin Kerr & Key Limitations of Heller by Orin Kerr The Second Amendment and State and Local Laws by Eugene Volokh My Sense of the Bottom Line from Heller by Tom Goldstein Heller Discussion Board: "Clarity is in the Eye of the Beholder by Alan Morrison Heller, Justice Steven's Dissent, and the Historian's Brief by Jim… [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:31 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Jim Lindgren comments further on the peculiar Lubiano/Hardt/Wiegman defense of the Group of 88: I strongly doubt that suggestions that the offending professors should "work as maids" or "return to the slave quarters" were "typically" offered by their critics. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 12:20 am
My apologies to Pete Townsend, but I thought of his famous lyric when reading this post from Jim Lindgren, about how Michelle Obama's salary went up from $121,910 in 2004 to $316,962 when her husband was elected to the Senate. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 4:48 pm
(This follows the flurry of activity a couple of weeks ago on the meaning of "natural born citizen" -- see Jim Lindgren, Solum, Jack Balkin, and Solum). [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:03 pm
I suspect it will get thrown out on procedural grounds, and for the reasons Jim Lindgren discussed, it... [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:53 pm
Jim Lindgren suggests that late 18th Century usage did assign the phrase a specialized legal meaning:I read with some amusement the struggles that some non-lawyers [and some lawyers as well] have been having understanding the language of Art II, Sec. 1 of the U.S. [read post]