Search for: "Jim Lindgren"
Results 81 - 100
of 273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 6:59 am
However, a new empirical study by my co-blogger Jim Lindgren suggests that the opposite may be true. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:33 am
(Jim Lindgren) Professor Philip Hamburger of Columbia University appreciated the scholarly comments he received from Volokh Conspiracy readers last year when I blogged his Privileges or Immunities article. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:33 am
(Jim Lindgren) Professor Philip Hamburger of Columbia University appreciated the scholarly comments he received from Volokh Conspiracy readers last year when I blogged his Privileges or Immunities article. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:50 am
(Jim Lindgren) From Wisconsin Dept. of Administration (tip to Wheeler Report):Thursday, March 10, 2011 Capitol opening delayed Thursday Capitol opening delayed Thursday The Wisconsin State Capitol did not open at 8 a.m. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:45 am
(Jim Lindgren) Questions have been raised whether the 2-hour notice given of the Wisconsin Senate committee meeting was adequate. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:45 am
(Jim Lindgren) Questions have been raised whether the 2-hour notice given of the Wisconsin Senate committee meeting was adequate. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:55 pm
(Jim Lindgren) The 138-page substitute for Wisconsin Senate Bill 11 is only 6 pages shorter than the 144-page original Bill 11.The senators seem to have left in everything that was not clearly fiscal. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:33 pm
(Jim Lindgren) The Wisconsin Senate has passed a budget bill with the “non-fiscal” provisions stripped out, just as I proposed last week in a manuscript on SSRN, a post at Volokh (“Wisconsin Senate Does Not Need a 3/5ths Quorum to Pass Much of the Budget Bill”), and an op-ed at National Review Online. [read post]
WISCONSIN: Meade on the scene at the Capitol says hundreds of protesters have gotten into the build…
9 Mar 2011, 6:38 pm
MORE STILL: An I-told-you-so from Jim Lindgren. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
(Jim Lindgren) Michael Stern has a thoughtful post at PointofOrder.com on the arrest clause of the Wisconsin and US constitutions.He argues (in part): As Akil Amar and Neal Katyal note in a 1995 law review article, modern cases have given the arrest clause such a narrow construction as to make it a “virtual nullity. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm
Says Jim Lindgren: I would hope that those who rely on the arrest clause of the state constitution would deal with the fact that the privilege against arrest applies “in all cases. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm
However, Jim Lindgren at the Volokh Controversy has parsed through the history and the precedent in posts here and here. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:31 pm
(Jim Lindgren) Does the Wisconsin Senate have the power to compel absent Democratic senators to return to the senate floor if they re-enter the state of Wisconsin? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:39 pm
JIM LINDGREN: A New Strategy For Wisconsin: Split out the union provisions and pass them by a simple majority. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:17 pm
(Jim Lindgren) I have an editorial up on National Review Online on the history of the super-majority quorum requirement and my proposal to split out the collective bargaining provisions and pass them first: The Republicans could split the bill into three bills. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:12 pm
(Jim Lindgren) The Wisconsin Senate today passed a resolution holding the absent Democratic senators in contempt if they did not return by 4pm today. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:36 pm
JIM LINDGREN: Wisconsin Senate Does Not Need a 3/5ths Quorum to Pass Much of the Budget Bill. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm
(Jim Lindgren) I have a new paper up on SSRN–Super Quorums Under the Wisconsin Constitution–that examines the constitutional three-fifths quorum requirement in Wisconsin. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:35 am
(Jim Lindgren) Nate Silver has a wonderful post comparing the 2012 Republican field to Republican and Democratic fields since 1999. [read post]
PROFESSOR ANN ALTHOUSE DELIVERS A SOUND THRASHING: “History tells us” something that history doesn’…
25 Jan 2011, 7:59 am
Jim Lindgren comments: So let’s see if this makes sense: 1. [read post]
