Search for: "Jody Coultas"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 7:15 am
By Jody Coultas, J.D. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:50 am
By Jody Coultas, J.D. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:10 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH Unfair Trade Practices Law.The federal district court in New York City declined to enjoin food distributor Kangadis Food Inc. from selling refined olive oil labeled as "100% Pure Olive Oil" (North American Olive Oil Association v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:37 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of State Unfair Trade Practices Law and contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.The federal district court in Albuquerque has denied in part fashion retailer Urban Outfitters, Inc. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:26 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 7:22 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.A Subway customer filed a nationwide class action lawsuit in the federal district court in Chicago, alleging that Subway violated the consumer protection statutes of all 50 states and the District of Columbia, after measuring a “Footlong” sandwich purchased from Subway and realizing it was less than 11 inches long (Buren v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:27 am
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.A civil litigant stated a Texas Deceptive Trade Practices—Consumer Protection Act (DTPA) claim for unconscionable conduct against LexisNexis based on its mandatory electronic filing fees charged to litigants in Texas state courts in Montgomery and Jefferson counties, according to the federal district court in Houston. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:14 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.A civil litigant stated a Texas Deceptive Trade Practices—Consumer Protection Act (DTPA) claim for unconscionable conduct against LexisNexis based on its mandatory electronic filing fees charged to litigants in Texas state courts in Montgomery and Jefferson counties, according to the federal district court in Houston. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 11:41 am
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:52 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law. [read post]
30 May 2012, 9:51 am
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.Institutional investors stated Minnesota consumer protection claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for allegedly misrepresenting its securities lending program, according to the federal district court in St. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 8:19 am
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.A supplement purchaser sufficiently alleged that a supplement manufacturer’s packaging of its protein drinks and bars was misleading in violation of the California Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in Oakland, California, has held. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:05 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.A federal district court in Camden, New Jersey certified a class action of Sam’s Club members that brought suit against Wal-Mart under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) for allegedly failing to disclose that its service agreement for “as-is” products actually excluded “as-is” products from coverage. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:20 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.Putative class representatives lacked standing to bring California Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) class action claims against Comcast because they lacked the requisite injury in fact, according to the federal district court in Fresno, California. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:19 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.A customer of Michaels Stores stated an Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act claim against the craft store for engaging in an unfair business practices relating to the failure to implement adequate security at its PIN pads, according to the federal district court in Chicago.Michaels’ PIN pads, used by consumers to pay by debit/credit cards, were replaced by a… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:53 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.The Alaska legislature’s directive that courts should give great weight to the Federal Trade Commission and federal court interpretations of the Federal Trade Commission Act when interpreting the Alaska Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (CPA) did not require the Alaska Supreme Court to overrule previous decisions under the law, the state high court held.An electric… [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:49 pm
Contact Lens Solution False Ad Claims Preempted by Food, Drug, and Cosmetic ActThis posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.Class action claims that a contact lens solution manufacturer used misleading advertising in violation of the California Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and False Advertising Law (FAL) were preempted by the Medical Devices Amendments of 1976 (MDA), an amendment to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), according to… [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 7:57 am
Internet Provider’s Fast Service Claims Did Not Violate State Unfair Trade Practice LawsThis posting was written by Jody Coultas, Editor of CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law.A New York Internet subscriber could not state a New York deceptive business practices law claim against Time Warner Cable for allegedly misrepresenting the speed of its “Road Runner” Internet service, according to the federal district court in New York City. [read post]
