Search for: "Joe Mullin" Results 1 - 20 of 346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2009, 12:09 am
On April 26, IPBiz had a post titled Mike Masnick (TechDirt) takes on Gary Odom (PatentHawk), which mentioned a statement made by Gary Odom about Joe Mullin as noted by Masnick:Amusingly, when Joe Mullin from IP Law & Business called Odom to comment, Odom refused, saying: "You're a hack job, man. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 8:28 am by Dennis Crouch
Joe Mullin is probably the country's leading out-of-the-beltway journalist who regularly covers patent law issues. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:55 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In a post on May 21, 2010, Joe Mullin goes after Erich Spangenberg, again. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In a post at Ars Technica titled Original “patent troll” may call it quits, says there’s no money in it ,Joe Mullin states:Niro's business was infuriating to corporations like Intel, whose patent problems were being tended to by its associate general counsel, Peter Detkin. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" For past recycling of Lemley by Mullin, seehttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2009/04/joe-mullin-on-copying.htmlElsewhere, PatentHawk (Gary Odom) reminds us of Stevens' first case:The first case Justice Stevens authored was Parker v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:20 pm
Arguably, Joe Mullin, who is not a patent lawyer, is out of touch with the nuts and bolts of patent litigation. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:19 am
Joe Mullin penned a sagging saga of supposedly secret patenting in his entry about Odom v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:26 am
Updating this ILB entry from May 13th, today Joe Mullin of IP Law & Business has a long and comprehensive... [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:05 pm by Walter Olson
Per Joe Mullin, many of the plaintiffs appear to be attorneys. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 8:35 pm by Mark Summerfield
A few days ago Ars Technica published a piece by Joe Mullin entitled ‘How the Aussie government "invented WiFi" and sued its way to $430 million’. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 5:44 pm
"Kentucky clerk jailed over same-sex marriage gets in copyright fracas; Kim Davis played 'Eye of the Tiger' at a rally, but not everyone was thrilled": Joe Mullin of Ars Technica has this report. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:10 pm
Samsung goes to a fourth jury trial; Apple wields design as a weapon, a strategy that has led to judicial paralysis": Joe Mullin of Ars Technica has this report. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 12:06 pm
"South Carolina will debate bill to block porn on new computers; Citizens who wanted to opt out of porn filter would have to pay $20 fee": Joe Mullin of Ars Technica has this report. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 9:05 am by Cesar Torres
Aurich Lawson / The Guardian In this episode of the Ars Technicast, Ars Tech Policy Editor Joe Mullin joins hosts Social Editor Cesar Torres and Ars Associate Writer Casey Johnston to talk about our coverage of NSA and its prime leaker, Edward Snowden. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 8:23 pm
In December 2008, there was a back-and-forth between Joe Mullin and Gary Odom (aka Patent Hawk) about Odom's patent infringement suit against Microsoft, then in ED Texas.At the bottom of the Mullin post was the text:Update: Gary Odom responds to this story. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:52 am
Per Joe Mullin’s must-read coverage at IP Law and Business, Rick Frenkel’s lawyer-critical blog is now entirely closed down even to private readers except as an archive for the use of lawyers in the related litigation. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:52 am
Per Joe Mullin’s must-read coverage at IP Law and Business, Rick Frenkel’s lawyer-critical blog is now entirely closed down even to private readers except as an archive for the use of lawyers in the related litigation. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:29 am
Joe Mullin has a piece titled Some IP Attorneys Look to Make Their Mark as Patent-Holders which includes the textThe possibility of being accused of copying is one reason that lawyers will find it "fraught with peril" to obtain patents on their own inventions, says Stanford Law School professor Mark Lemley. [read post]