Search for: "John/Jane Doe " Results 41 - 60 of 1,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Utah), which strikes me as quite correct: John and Jane Doe are the parents of JD, a minor student who attended Skyridge High School. [read post]
” China previously told the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol) that John Doe #1 and Jane Doe #1 were wanted for corruption charges, and continues to maintain that this was a legitimate law enforcement operation. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Chohan, decided Friday by the Supreme Court of Texas, in an opinion by Justice Jimmy Blacklock, joined by Chief Justice Nathan Hecht and Justice Brett Busby, and mostly joined by Justice Jane Bland (three Justices didn't participate in the decision, so these four were a majority of the remaining six): This case arises from a fatal accident on an icy, unlit stretch of highway near Amarillo. [read post]
28 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
The sentence "The Westside rapist entered Jane's house" does not involve an attribution of an intention. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
And so I think we just had a lot of experience in dicksterity Kind of what does it mean to try these things and to experimented and to do that? [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And here is the second decision that was upheld, Magistrate Judge John Anderson's decision in Doe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am by Eugene Volokh
. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
 § 367.3, enacted in 2019, adds to that: A protected person who is a party in a civil proceeding may proceed using a pseudonym, either John Doe, Jane Doe, or Doe, for the true name of the protected person and may exclude or redact from all pleadings and documents filed in the action other identifying characteristics of the protected person. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 11:58 am by Ronald Mann
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for a majority of six (all but Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:06 am by Alan Neff
The New York Times reported that Chief Justice John Roberts’ wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, “has made millions in her career recruiting lawyers to prominent law firms, some of which have business before the court. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
John Fetterman Sponsored a Bill from the Hospital. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 2:46 pm by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
Greg Lambert 0:38 Yeah, so in she does great work and reaching out to a lot of women that are on there that are members of the bar, members of the bench, and just members of the legal community. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
John Fetterman’s office announced he had voluntarily sought treatment for clinical depression, the reaction was far different, signaling a shift in the way those holding public office talk about mental health. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
While in the National Archives, Plaintiffs were subject to a pattern of ongoing misconduct by federal government officials, specifically National Archives security officers, Defendants John Does and Jane Doe, who targeted Plaintiffs and intentionally chilled their religious speech and expression by requiring Plaintiffs to remove or cover their attire because of their pro-life messages.6. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 8:37 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendant Jane Doe 2 and Defendant Jane Doe 3 … stopped Plaintiffs … and instructed them to remove their hats…. 62. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:17 pm by Kenan Farrell
Perry of Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPDefendants: Ben Watkins, John Does 1-10Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Indiana Crime Victim’s Relief Act, DeceptionCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: M. [read post]