Search for: "John Bellinger" Results 261 - 280 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2014, 6:19 am by Benjamin Wittes
As John Bellinger has repeatedly pointed out, moreover, in the context of 2001 and 2002, the criminal law also did not yet cover the conduct of many people held at Guantanamo. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 11:14 am by Julian Ku
 The one exception, a reference to the brief filed by John Bellinger and former U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 9:50 pm
  Added to the reply brief was  a letter from the State Department’s legal adviser, John B. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:50 pm by Ritika Singh
Meanwhile, Lawfare’s own John Bellinger and Matthew C. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm by Ritika Singh
Lawfare‘s own John Bellinger has an op-ed in today’s Washington Post arguing that Moammar Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam and Gaddafi’s former intelligence chief, Abdullah al-Senussi, should be prosecuted in Libya’s courts instead of being turned over to the International Criminal Court. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:19 am by Robert Chesney
And as John Bellinger notes, the US government for years has gone to great lengths to defend our legal positions with allies, often in the form of private meetings and conferences.  [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:26 pm
 It will feature a screening of an excerpt from the documentary The Reckoning, and then a panel discussion that will have Gary Solis, Jane Stromseth, John Bellinger, and me, and moderated by Ruth Wedgwood. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:24 am
" Regardless about how Koh feels about fundraising, the chance to have significant power in his field of expertise must be a compelling opportunity: "It's certainly the most prestigious international law office in the federal government, if not the most prestigious general counsel office in the government overall," said John Bellinger III, who served as legal adviser until last month's change of power in Washington. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 3:18 pm
-- the matter was discussed by not only Harriet Miers, but also John Bellinger (when he was NSC General Counsel), White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales and, of course, David Addington. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 7:34 am by Raffaela Wakeman
John Bellinger III revisits the 2001 AUMF in an interview on the Council on Foreign Relations web site, coming to the conclusion that the nature of the authorization will increasingly limit counterterrorism operations and needs updating. [read post]
7 May 2011, 4:29 am by Benjamin Wittes
John Bellinger has said more to defend the administration on the legality of these operations, and far more persuasively, than anyone in the administration to date. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:35 am by Garrett Hinck
John Bellinger flagged Jennifer Newstead’s nomination as State Department Legal Advisor. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 11:15 am by Jordan Brunner
John Bellinger provided his thoughts about the NSC memorandum. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm by Alex Potcovaru
The prepared testimony John Bellinger is available here and the testimony of Kathleen Hicks is here. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:38 am by Rishabh Bhandari, David Hopen
”   ICYMI: This Weekend, on Lawfare In response to the Chilcot Inquiry, John Bellinger offered a defense of U.S. and UK lawyers’ decision to rely on U.N. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 11:01 am by David Bosco
” As John Bellinger has pointed out, there does not seem to be any statutory basis for these actions, especially as Bolton signaled clearly that he will be working within the bounds of existing legislation. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 2:18 pm by Jordan Brunner
On Lawfare, John Bellinger noted that Bannon’s presence represents a commingling of the “political side” of the White House with the national security side, which is an “unusual” deviation from past practice. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:17 am by William Ford
John Bellinger argued that the U.S. and the International Criminal Court should both take action to avoid unnecessary collision once John Bolton becomes President Trump’s national security adviser. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 6:04 am by William Ford
John Bellinger supplemented Goldsmith and Hathaway’s points with his own thoughts on the lack of legal basis for the strikes, particularly the lack of basis in international law. [read post]
 In 2010, our colleague John Bellinger wrote a much-discussed op-ed in the Washington Post calling for an AUMF revision, pointing out that “[a]s U.S. forces continue to target terrorist leaders outside Afghanistan, it is increasingly unclear whether these terrorists, even if they are planning attacks against U.S. targets, are the same individuals, or even part of the same organization, behind the Sept. 11 attacks. [read post]