Search for: "John Doe, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John Doe, et al., Defendants-appellees" Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Disgorgement does not “simply return[] the defendant to the place he would have occupied had he not broken the law,” the Court held. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James P. Flynn
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
Rubin et al., an appellate court in Massachusetts affirmed dismissal of plaintiff’s claims, holding that Agero failed to establish that two of the defendants, Timothy Schneider and Matthew Capozzi, owed Agero a duty of loyalty. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:29 pm by scanner1
CITY OF MISSOULA and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:38 pm by Law Lady
Harris Private Property Rights Protection Act -- Trial court erred by denying award of costs to prevailing city in inverse condemnation action in which court found that no taking had occurred -- A prevailing governmental entity in an inverse condemnation action is entitled to recover costsCARIBBEAN CONDOMINIUM, ETC., ET AL., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. [read post]