Search for: "John Duffy"
Results 201 - 220
of 530
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2014, 8:53 pm
There’s also a detailed analysis and commentary by John Duffy that begins: Although Alice Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:46 am
John Duffy is the Samuel H. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:57 am
., holding that POM can bring a Lanham Act claim challenging food and beverage labels regulated under the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, continues to generate coverage, including from John Duffy for this blog, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, and Michael Bobelian of Forbes. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:53 am
Yesterday's order comes after US District Judge John Darrah found earlier that Prenda lawyer Paul Duffy had lied to the court about what happened regarding serving a complaint in another district. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 3:33 pm
Professor John Duffy noted: “A second important point about POM is that the reasoning in the decision shows the Supreme Court’s increasingly ambivalent approach to administrative regulation. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 3:33 pm
John Duffy noted: “A second important point about POM is that the reasoning in the decision shows the Supreme Court’s increasingly ambivalent approach to administrative regulation. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 11:53 am
Chiang, Colleen Chien, Dennis Crouch, Kevin Collins, Jeanne Fromer, Peter Lee, Michael Risch and David Schwartz; with commentary from John Duffy, Jeff Lefstin, Ted Sichelman, Chester Chuang and others. - 15 year anniversary of 47 USC 230. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 11:53 am
Chiang, Colleen Chien, Dennis Crouch, Kevin Collins, Jeanne Fromer, Peter Lee, Michael Risch and David Schwartz; with commentary from John Duffy, Jeff Lefstin, Ted Sichelman, Chester Chuang and others. - 15 year anniversary of 47 USC 230. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:02 am
That ruling, however, didn't stop one of the two movies, Popular Demand, being the subject of the Columbia and then US Court of Appeals case.AF Holdings was represented by Paul Duffy, who at the previous lower court hearings as associated with Prenda Law. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:32 pm
Duffy. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:30 am
Duffy Class of 1960 Professor of Law at Yale Law School. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
The second is John Fabian Witt, Allen H. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 6:51 am
Rob Merges and John Duffy’s Patent Law and Policy is the leading patent law casebook, and contains extensive commentary from its authors. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:31 pm
The organization and the lawyers widely believed to be behind it—John Steele, Paul Hansmeier, and Paul Duffy—have been sanctioned by numerous federal judges. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm
Pro: David Schwartz, John Duffy Con: Michael Meuer, Mark Lemley *** John: Hostility to patent trolls unfounded as a theoretical matter. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:05 pm
Just last week, Paul Hansmeier, Paul Duffy, and John Steele—the three lawyers commonly linked to Prenda—were found to be in contempt of a devastating sanction order won by AT&T and Comcast. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 5:40 pm
Prenda-linked lawyers John Steele, Paul Hansmeier, and Paul Duffy have paid some of those sanctions and resisted others. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am
At trial Judge Duffy found infringement as to certain general concepts of Andersen and his life and friends as set forth for the first time in plaintiff's book. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:15 am
In addition to panels on patent law doctrine, pharmaceutical & biotech patents, empirical studies of patents and litigation, remedies, commercialization, economic theory of patents, international patent law, and the history of patent law, PatCon will feature a “patent trolls” debate pitting Mark Lemley (Stanford) & Michael Meurer (BU) against John Duffy (Virginia) & David Schwartz (IIT-Chicago) on whether “hostility to patent trolls is not well… [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:56 pm
[8]I agree with Abramowicz and Duffy that the answer to this question is “yes, it would be surprising. [read post]
