Search for: "John J Downes"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,439
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2023, 6:19 pm
Richard J. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
On 5 July 2023 Susie Alegre handed down judgment in the case of Bekoe v LB Islington [2023] EWHC 1668 (KB). [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Ryan (Associate Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Thomas J. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:28 am
Patrick J. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:20 am
John Hudson and Shane Harris report for the Washington Post. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:31 pm
Beau J. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:46 pm
J. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:53 am
J. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
On 25 May 2023, Saini J handed down judgment in Packham CBE v Wightman and others [2023] EWHC 1256 (KB) in favour of the claimant. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:30 am
J. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:22 am
” “Centripetal told the Federal Circuit the board’s actions thus far should be undone because Brian J. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On 19 May 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment dismissing the appeal in Stoute v News Group Newspapers [2023] EWCA Civ 523. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Klein’s ultimate message is that, if the Republicans never agree to increase the debt ceiling, President Biden will lose politically if he does anything that the courts might ultimately strike down. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:30 am
Consider his well-known statement in an 1810 letter to John Colvin: [A] strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen: but it is not the highest. the laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. to lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property & all those who are enjoying them with us;… [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Essentially, the legal situation boils down to a classic case of conflicting statutes. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
The government had a valid search warrant, and there is no principle of law that makes a defendant's ability to slow down a search by using encryption a legal basis for suppressing the evidence when the search eventually succeeds. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:01 am
Your gender, your gender identity, your sexuality, your religious beliefs, that those things don't hold you down in any way, and that you can love those things and have those things be a part of your life. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
On 25 April 2023, Chamberlain J handed down judgement in the data protection case of Ali v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police. [read post]
