Search for: "John Marshall" Results 21 - 40 of 6,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In a case of monumental importance, the Court failed to provide the kind of well-reasoned opinion that will stand the test of time, and it failed to marshal a genuine consensus among the Justices.This result suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts was unable to do what he supposedly most cares about, namely protect the prestige of the Court he leads and produce minimalist decisions. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 7:39 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Supreme Court will hear Trump presidential immunity argument April 25 (Kevin Breuninger, CNBC) Trump’s on the ballot, but the Supreme Court left key constitutional questions unanswered (John Fritze & Marshall Cohen, CNN) Momentum builds in major homelessness case before U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Bashman
“Trump’s on the ballot, but the Supreme Court left key constitutional questions unanswered”: John Fritze and Marshall Cohen of CNN have this report. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:25 am by Beatrice Yahia
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
John Charles Thomas, The Poetic Justice:  A Memoir (2022). 43. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Even in the face of overwhelming evidence, Biden family members often marshal political allies and media to kill investigations or cut sweetheart deals. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Unlike the Jeffersonian Brandeis, Taft’s heroes were John Marshall and Alexander Hamilton; and like the Federalists, Taft exalted national economic development over states’ rights. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:06 pm by Rick Hasen
John Fritze and Marshall Cohen for CNN: When it comes to deciding whether former President Donald Trump should be booted from Colorado’s ballot, the easiest path the Supreme Court could take now may wind up causing the most… Continue reading The post “Why a Supreme Court easy out in Trump ballot battle could lead to post-election chaos” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:54 am by Howard Bashman
“Why a Supreme Court easy out in Trump ballot battle could lead to post-election chaos”: John Fritze and Marshall Cohen of CNN have this report. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:23 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Trump Asks Supreme Court to Pause Ruling Denying Him Absolute Immunity (Adam Liptak & Abbie VanSickle, The New York Times) Judiciary Braces for Case Spike if Supreme Court Guts Chevron (Suzanne Monyak, Bloomberg Law) Why a Supreme Court easy out in Trump ballot battle could lead to post-election chaos (John Fritze and Marshall Cohen, CNN) What happens now that Trump has gone to the Supreme Court in his immunity fight (Laura Jarrett,… [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Gerald Gunther had been working for decades on the volume on the Marshall Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The event will be moderated by John Marshall Harlan II Professor of Law and Director of the Racial Justice Project Penelope Andrews. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Marshals sneak up on suspect, kick him in the head, and take turns stomping on him while he's unconscious. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Howard Bashman
“How using the 14th Amendment against Trump went from a ‘pipe-dream fantasy’ to the Supreme Court”: Marshall Cohen of CNN has this report. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:50 am by Neal S. Gainsberg
She earned her JD from UIC John Marshall Law School right here in Chicago. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 11:27 am by Christopher J. Walker
The Path of the Prerogatives John Mikhail The path of the prerogatives refers to the process by which the royal prerogative powers outlined in Blackstone’s Commentaries entered into American constitutional law. [read post]