Search for: "John Paul Schnapper-Casteras" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
"Dueling and Discovery": John Paul Schnapper-Casteras had this post Tuesday at the "ACSBlog. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 10:29 am by Andrew Hamm
 Speakers include Andrew Grossman, John Paul Schnapper-Casteras, Gail Heriot, Richard Lempert, and Wallace Hall, a named defendant in the case; Ilya Shapiro will serve as moderator. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 7:01 am by Andrew Hamm
Andrew Grossman and John Paul Schnapper-Casteras will focus on Fisher v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Mostly Cato links: Today, Monday afternoon: Ilya Shapiro and John Paul Schnapper-Casteras preview Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am by SHG
In advance of the argument, the Cato Institute put on a debate between Ilya Shapiro and John Paul Schnapper-Casteras, Special Counsel for Appellate and Supreme Court Advocacy, NAACP Legal Defense Fund. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:13 pm by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
John Paul Schnapper-Casteras is Special Counsel for Appellate and Supreme Court Advocacy at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund in Washington, D.C. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:11 am by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
John Paul Schnapper-Casteras is Special Counsel for Appellate and Supreme Court Advocacy at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund in Washington, DC. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:19 pm by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
John Paul Schnapper-Casteras is Special Counsel for Appellate and Supreme Court Advocacy at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
John Paul Schnapper-Casteras is Special Counsel for Appellate and Supreme Court Advocacy at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:34 am by Andrew Hamm
  Speakers will include Lisa Bornstein of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, Brad Garcia of O’Melveny & Myers LLP, John Paul Schnapper-Casteras of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, and Lisa Crooms-Robinson and Valerie Schneider of Howard University School of Law. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 11:18 am by Andrew Hamm
., the Cato Institute will feature Andrew Grossman, John Paul Schnapper-Casteras, Gail Heriot, Richard Lempert, and Wallace Hall, a named defendant in the case; Ilya Shapiro will serve as moderator. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:28 am by Kali Borkoski
Health-care symposium contributors: Nicholas Bagley – University of Michigan Randy Barnett – Georgetown Michael Cannon – Cato David Rivkin – BakerHostetler Einer Elhauge – Harvard Tom Fisher – Indiana Abbe Gluck – Yale Brianne Gorod – Constitutional Accountability Center Timothy Jost – Washington and Lee Adam White – Boyden Gray & Associates Housing symposium contributors: Cory Andrews – Washington Legal Foundation… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
University of Texas at Austin on the Eve of Oral Argument” [Cato event Dec. 7 with Andrew Grossman, John Paul Schnapper-Casteras, Gail Heriot, Richard Lempert, and Wallace Hall, moderated by Ilya Shapiro] Theme of this year’s Federalist Society lawyers’ convention was Congress, videos of related panels [originalist views of Congress, Congressional dysfunction, deference and delegation, prospects for getting legislative branch to reclaim… [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
” At ACSblog, John Paul Schnapper-Casteras discusses the Chief Justice’s annual report on the federal judiciary and why his “invocation of dueling to discuss civil procedure rule changes,” although “tongue-in-cheek,” is nonetheless “particularly ill-fitting. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am by Amy Howe
  And in an op-ed for the Richmond Times-Dispatch, John Paul Schnapper-Casteras outlines “three key reasons” why, in his view, the Court’s decision in Loving v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
  At ACSblog, John Paul Schnapper-Casteras argues that, as “the justices grapple with how to resolve the question of same-sex marriage and write the majority opinion, they would be well-served by going back to the future and relying upon” the Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:32 am by Jane Chong
John Paul Schnapper-Casteras and Lawrence Korb have a piece in Politico urging Washington to call Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s bluff and prepare for a full withdrawal of U.S. troops. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” Other views on Masterpiece Cakeshop come from John Paul Schnapper-Casteras at the Harvard Law Review Blog, who maintains that “[r]eligious beliefs, no matter how sincerely felt or well-intentioned, simply cannot justify differential treatment of LGBTQ individuals or couples in places of public accommodation,” and Steve Sanders in an op-ed for The New York Times, who argues that “[b]eliefs may not be regulated by the government, but… [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, John Paul Schnapper-Casteras observes that a trio of opinions at the end of October Term 2017 “suggests this might be the year that the Court begins to meaningfully grapple with the constitutional implications of emerging technologies. [read post]