Search for: "John Rubin" Results 181 - 200 of 383
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
  The person in that position works closely with John Rubin and the Indigent Defense Education group. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:52 am by Jim Sedor
Lobbying “How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat” by Anahad O’Connor for New York Times “Lobbying Registrations Are Down, But The Influence Industry Is Flourishing” by Catherine Ho for Washington Post “Congressman Offers Unusual Defense in Ethics Probe” by John Dunbar for Center for Public Integrity Campaign Finance “How These Powerful Women Learned to Love Fundraising” by Elise Viebeck for Washington Post Ethics California:… [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 12:03 pm by John Rubin
Richardson, 341 N.C. 585, 590 (1995); see also John Rubin, The Law of Self-Defense in North Carolina at 47–48 (UNC Sch. of Gov. 1996). [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 12:03 pm by John Rubin
Richardson, 341 N.C. 585, 590 (1995); see also John Rubin, The Law of Self-Defense in North Carolina at 47–48 (UNC Sch. of Gov. 1996). [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm by Simon Lester
The institute’s president, Felicia Wong, is in direct contact with members of the transition team and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:35 pm by Kristin E. Hickman
The Legislation and Regulation textbook by John Manning and Matthew Stephenson presents a very different vision of the first-year course compared to The Regulatory State textbook by Lisa Bressman, Edward Rubin, and Kevin Stack, for example. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:38 pm
According to their claim, the advisor Ash Narayan failed to disclose multiple conflicts of interest and further ignored their interests in failing to invest in conservative investments.Keyon Dooling, John St. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 1:29 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Some will support Clinton, as is true of Scowcroft and, I think, Rubin. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The case—which John Rubin discussed here—held that a no contact order issued under G.S. 15A-1340.50 may extend only to the victim of the underlying offense; it may not include the victim’s children. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
The case—which John Rubin discussed here—held that a no contact order issued under G.S. 15A-1340.50 may extend only to the victim of the underlying offense; it may not include the victim’s children. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:21 am by John Rubin
See John Rubin, The Law of Self Defense § 3.3(d), at pp. 71–72. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:21 am by John Rubin
See John Rubin, The Law of Self Defense § 3.3(d), at pp. 71–72. [read post]
12 May 2016, 11:41 am by Jamie Markham
Discussing the law immediately after it passed in 2008, John Rubin wrote (here, on page 3) that placing the responsibility for determining egregious aggravation on the judge—not the jury—was “likely unconstitutional” under Blakely v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 11:41 am by Jamie Markham
Discussing the law immediately after it passed in 2008, John Rubin wrote (here, on page 3) that placing the responsibility for determining egregious aggravation on the judge—not the jury—was “likely unconstitutional” under Blakely v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 7:17 am by Cody M. Poplin
 Michael Rubin, Johnathan Schanzer, David Makovsky, and Tamara Cofman Wittes will offer testimony. [read post]