Search for: "John Rubin" Results 21 - 40 of 374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Steve Watkins’ Woes Mount with FEC Probe into His Father” by Melanie Zanona and John Bresnahan for Politico Ethics National: “Erik Prince Recruits Ex-Spies to Help Infiltrate Liberal Groups” by Mark Mazzetti and Adam Goldman (New York Times) for MSN National: “House Democrats Request Appeal Asking Court to Enforce Subpoena for Former Trump White House Counsel Donald McGahn” by Spencer Hsu and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) for Seattle Times California:… [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson report that “leaving the contentious issues in the dispute aside, the event served to spotlight the recurring problem of spectator access to the nation’s highest court. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Three Republican senators – Ted Cruz and John Cornyn of Texas and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina – got more money than the rest of the Judiciary Committee combined. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:54 am by John Rubin
See John Rubin, Relief from a Criminal Conviction: Frequently Asked Questions (Prayer for Judgment Continued (PJC)) (2018). [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, separate counsel was an intervening and superseding cause of any damages (see Boye v Rubin & Bailin, LLP, 152 AD3d 1, 10 [1st Dept 2017]). [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Manchester United have accused the Sun newspaper of receiving advanced notice of an intended attack on the house of executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward and have made a complaint to IPSO. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 3:30 am by Edith Roberts
” In a new episode of Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast, Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin “get you current with the latest Obamacare case and the challenge to ‘faithless electors’”; they also “highlight star-powered arguments that featured tense rebuttals and even millennial slang. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 6:16 pm by Howard Bashman
John Kruzel of The Hill reports that “Appeals court appears wary of letting Trump reinstate death sentences. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 9:00 am by Tom Smith
That the House did not is the only reason Pelosi embraced John Dean's silly idea -- which has drastically backfired. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson collect tips from veteran Supreme Court practitioners on how to take advantage of “the court’s new guidance giving advocates two uninterrupted minutes to speak before the justices jump in and start tearing their arguments apart. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:05 am by SHG
*In a follow-up column in WaPo, Jennifer Rubin assumes this must be doable, because of course it is. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:00 pm by Howard Bashman
Maura Dolan and John Myers of The Los Angeles Times report that “Trump may withhold tax returns and appear on ballot, California Supreme Court rules. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “Chief Justice John G. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Sara DePasquale
[Editor’s note: Because the information in this post cuts across multiple subject areas, the post will appear on several School of Government blogs.] [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin and Kimberly Robinson report that “[t]hree of the 28 lawyers who’ll argue at the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin notes that “Justice [Harry] Blackmun made detailed assessments of Supreme Court advocates, grading them like law students”: Future justices John Roberts, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Samuel Alito received GPAs of 2.0, 2.8 and 2.5, respectively. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin reports that “[t]he dispute puts the hot-button immigration issue in front of the justices—with the added complexity of speech and criminal justice implications. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Mona Pinchis
When asked the meaning of the phrase “In time of war or other emergency in international relations,” John Leddy of the U.S. delegation replied that in time of war, “I think no one would question the need of a Member, or the right of a Member, to take action relating to its security interests in time of war and to determine for itself– which I think we cannot deny – what its security interests are. [read post]