Search for: "John Turner v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2010, 12:19 am by Lawrence Solum
Ferguson the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Louisiana statute mandating separate but (in reality not) equal railway accommodations for black and white passengers did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:03 pm by Jo-Ann Wallace
  I hope that John Pollock’s optimism in that regard proves true, but with many states facing the bleakest fiscal outlook on record, advocates must turn a keen eye to ensuring that Turner does not signal a retreat from existing rights. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 5:22 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
V Kelly Turner and Emma M French and John Dialesandro and Ariane Middel and David M Hondula and George Ban Weiss and Hana Abdellati, How are cities planning for heat? [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Overton v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:04 am
Nik TurnerApplicant Nik Turner claims that HAWKWIND is not famous, but just an obscure "cult" band, that Brock is not the prior user in the United States, and that Brock has abandoned any rights he may have had.David BrockRead comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Thoughts? [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:46 am
- For Applicant Nik Turner: Evan Cohen of Manifesto Records The Board stated that each side would get 30 minutes to present its case. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Turner v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
FailingerDenying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:58 am by Mark Litwak
In return, the United States protects the work of French authors in the United States.This means that the United States will protect a French author in the United States in the same manner and extent as the United States protects American authors. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:35 am by John Elwood
  And yes, the Court is indeed holding United States v. [read post]