Search for: "John or Jane Doe" Results 41 - 60 of 1,052
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2013, 6:56 pm by APransky
Since John and Jane have common friends, one of these friends may tell Jane about the posting. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 3:23 pm by christopher
The John or Jane Doe copyright infringement defendant was tracked down via ISP subpoena and proceeded pro se (might it be an attorney?) [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 5:51 pm by Howard Friedman
Jane, John and Mary Doe face the imminent and ongoing deprivation of their constitutional rights, the potential loss of necessary medical care, and the stigma attached to being the subject of an unfounded child abuse investigation.... [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:38 am by Laura Orr
You can find a list of the Oregon’s recent BitTorrent and Peer-to-Peer (download) cases, copies of complaints, and other information at the Oregon Intellectual Property Law’s February 26, 2013, post: List of Oregon Download Cases – 2013. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:22 am by Alex Nealon
John and Jane Does 1-100 United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed on June […] [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm by J DeVoy
DeVoy A common feature of criminal and civil actions against unknown defendants is the need for subpoenas, warrants, or other court orders to ascertain John (or Jane) Doe’s true identity. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 3:51 am by SHG
For a while now, Eugene Volokh has been engaged in a battle against the use of pseudonymous litigation, the John or Jane Does that seem to do an awful lot of litigating these days. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
You can see the Complaint (alleging breach of contract, defamation, disclosure of private facts, and related torts) in Jane Doe & John Doe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:29 am
Let's pretend it's the middle of October, and John Doe and Jane Smith are both seeking the same U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:15 am by Lior Strahilevitz
In a brand new paper I advocate a novel approach to deciding when litigants should be permitted to sue using a John Doe or Jane Doe pseudonym. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:47 am by SHG
But as it turns out, Jane Roe wasn’t really the source of accusations against Doe. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 10:18 am
HERRIN, and JOHN and JANE   DOES 1-25, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
When John and Jane later sued DeBellis and the Diocese, the Monroe County Supreme Court dismissed the case. [read post]
10 May 2014, 11:11 am by Kimberly Bennett
The case arose when the plaintiffs, Jane Doe and John Doe, commenced the suit in the Massachusetts Superior Court [official website], challenging the practice by which the pledge is recited each morning in the public schools of the town of Acton and the Acton-Boxborough regional school... [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 2:24 am
Sheriffs hand-delivered notices to each "John Doe" and "Jane Doe" in two camps and taped notices, in English and Spanish, on posts at Hope City and Camp Runamuck II, as well as at the abandoned [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:16 pm
Second, expansion of the practice is covered along with the reasons why it is disfavored and what the legal test is for allowing fictitious names in litigation, Finally, the article addresses the wide range of names used for pseudonyms beyond just Jane and John Doe. [read post]