Search for: "John/Jane Doe " Results 1 - 20 of 785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 2:59 pm by Ari Ezra Waldman
The bill currently being considered allows certain domestic abuse victims to sue as "Jane Does" or "John Does." [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:26 am by Marty Schwimmer
Blink 182 is playing a concert in Massachusetts on the 9th, and they’re expecting trouble from 100 John Does, 100 Jane Does, and the XYZ company.  [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 8:06 am by Marty Schwimmer
A previous discussion of John Doe orders here. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:43 am by Marty Schwimmer
Licensing agent for Weezer files Jane Doe order against John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company in advance of Weezer appearing at the Cynthia Woods Mitchell Pavilion in Woodlands, Texas (near Houston). [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:41 pm by Margot Patterson
John Doe and Jane Doe (2014 FC 161) has already received considerable attention for its approach to deterring so-called “copyright trolls”: plaintiffs with “improper motives” who file multitudes of infringement lawsuits to extort quick settlements. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:46 pm
  John and Jane have sex.Neither John nor Jane should be having sex; neither one is sufficiently sober to effectively consent. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:10 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00672-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:09 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00671-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:06 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00668-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:08 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00670-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:03 am by Legal Profession Prof
Respondent represented her son, John Doe, in a child custody dispute pending in Fayette County Family Court. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 6:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
After John Doe assaulted a pregnant Jane Doe (he was the father of her children, who were home when the assault took place), the Department of Children and Families got Jane to agree to stay away from John, who could not have any contact with her children. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 6:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The answer is that you have to name the defendants as John or Jane Doe. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
  Table of Contents   Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:05 am by SHG
They’re always John Doe, and the accuser is Jane Doe, no relation. [read post]