Search for: "Johns v. Wilson" Results 261 - 280 of 763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Public Schools: Cases, Controversies and Curricula, (Education, Citizenship, National Identity and Core Values In Western Societies, Brill Publishers (2019 Forthcoming)).Cary Franklin, Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand down Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In light of the reduction of her award of damages to $600,000 from $3.5m Rebel Wilson has lodged an appeal with the High Court to restore the original ruling of Judge John Dixon and the corresponding award of damages. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Noah Feldman’s superb new book, The Three Lives of James Madison: Genius, Partisan, President, is filled with fascinating insights relevant to contemporary American law and politics. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34 (2d Dept 2006). [read post]
10 May 2018, 4:12 am by SHG
” (This push gained little traction; but Chief Justice John Roberts, who helped draft the measure as a young administration staffer, would go on to pen the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Herring v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has considered the costs decision in the case of Ali & Anor v Channel 5 Broadcast Ltd [2018] EWHC 840 (Ch). which involved the consideration of Part 36 offers, apologies and procedural issues such as the Defendants’ failure to serve a costs budget. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by David Markus
Congrats to Judge Wilson for being recognized by the Green Bag for exemplary legal writing for his dissent in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Wilson v Bauer Media (Costs) [2018] VSC 161 John Dixon J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on an indemnity basis. [read post]