Search for: "Johnson v. Fox" Results 1 - 20 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2018, 1:24 pm by Curt Cutting
Massdevice.com reports that a jury in Indiana awarded $10 million in compensatory damages and $25 million in punitive damages against Johnson & Johnson last week, in a product liability lawsuit involving pelvic mesh.Johnson & Johnson is defending against punitive damages claims on multiple fronts, in cases involving pelvic mesh, hip implants, and talc products.Related posts:Los Angeles trial court tosses $417 million talc verdictMissouri appellate court reverses… [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 11:56 am by Curt Cutting
  It won a similar case that went to trial last year in California.The company has been hit with some big punitive damages awards in cases involving claims that talc itself causes ovarian cancer, but so far those awards have been tossed out during post-trial motions or on appeal.Related posts:Los Angeles trial court tosses $417 million talc verdictMissouri appellate court reverses $62 million punitive damages award in talc case, finding no jurisdiction (Fox v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:26 pm by Curt Cutting
  The latest, as reported by the Legal Intelligencer, is a verdict awarding $100 million in punitive damages, on top of $20 million in compensatory damages, to a woman who claimed she was injured by the company's defective pelvic mesh.Related posts:Philadelphia jury awards $25 million in punitive damages against Johnson & JohnsonJohnson & Johnson hit for $80 million in punitive damages in New Jersey talc caseJohnson & Johnson hit for $25 million in… [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 1:04 pm by Alexander Zodikoff
Johnson & Johnson, JCCP4872, Superior Court of Los Angeles, in which a $417M verdict was overturned; and Fox v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:53 pm by Curt Cutting
  Juries have awarded punitive damages in other mesh cases, as well as in cases involving hip implants and talc products.Related posts:Johnson & Johnson hit for $80 million in punitive damages in New Jersey talc caseJohnson & Johnson hit for $25 million in punitive damages in IndianaLos Angeles trial court tosses $417 million talc verdictMissouri appellate court reverses $62 million punitive damages award in talc case, finding no jurisdiction (Fox… [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
En Misuri, Estados Unidos, un jurado falló a favor de Jackie Fox, una mujer que falleció a los 62 años de edad víctima del cáncer de ovario, y ordenó a Johnson & Johnson (J&J) a pagar a sus herederos una millonaria compensación atribuyendo el cáncer de ovario al uso que durante décadas hizo Jackie Fox del talco para bebés de esta marca. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 10:01 am by Pete Strom
Un jurado del estado de Missouri recientemente premio $72 Millones en daos a la familia de los demandantes de Jacqueline Fox, quien perdió la vida por cáncer de ovario después de usar el polvo para bebe de Johnson & Johnson […] [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 10:01 am by Lauren Robirds
Un jurado del estado de Missouri recientemente premio $72 Millones en daos a la familia de los demandantes de Jacqueline Fox, quien perdió la vida por cáncer de ovario después de usar el polvo para bebe de Johnson & Johnson […] [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 10:51 pm by Curt Cutting
  Plaintiffs' counsel, Mark Robinson of Robinson Calcagnie, says his clients will appeal.Related posts:Missouri appellate court reverses $62 million punitive damages award in talc case, finding no jurisdiction (Fox v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:19 pm by Curt Cutting
  Presumably, the other three Missouri talc verdicts against Johnson & Johnson will see a similar fate.Related posts:L.A. jury awards $347 million in punitive damages against Johnson & Johnson in talc caseJohnson & Johnson gets hit again for punitive damages in Missouri talc litigationJohnson & Johnson hit for $65 million in punitive damages in third big talc verdictJohnson & Johnson hit with another big punitive… [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:22 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
(For some of the research, see Sarah Shullman here, and Timothy Johnson et. al. here). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 4:31 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) M v F & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 273 (17 March 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Johnson , Re [2011] EWHC 593 (Admin) (17 March 2011) Q, R (on the application of) v Q Constabulary & Anor [2011] EWHC 592 (Admin) (17 March 2011) Hinds, R (on the application of) v Blackpool Council [2011] EWHC 591 (Admin) (17 March 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) The Lorenz Consultancy Ltd. v Fox-Davies Capital Ltd. [2011]… [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:41 pm by Joseph Tomain
In 1978, the Court held in FCC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 2:57 am by Walter Olson
Judge denies motion to dismiss Title IX suit against Laura Kipnis [Maddie Burakoff, Daily Northwestern, KC Johnson thread on Twitter] First Circuit appeal considers whether persons unconnected with a university can initiate Title IX complaints against it [District of Rhode Island decision in Doe v. [read post]